Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604462›Full record

ArticleeNeurologicalSci2021

Detect it so you can treat it: A case series and proposed checklist to detect neurotoxicity in checkpoint therapy.

Saskia Bolz, Thivyah Ramakrishnan, Michael Fleischer, Elisabeth Livingstone, Benjamin Stolte, Andreas Thimm, Kathrin Kizina, Selma Ugurel, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Martin Glas and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Drug-related immune-mediated myelopathies.Frontiers in neurology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saskia BolzDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Thivyah RamakrishnanDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Michael FleischerDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Elisabeth LivingstoneDepartment of Dermatology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Benjamin StolteDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Andreas ThimmDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Kathrin KizinaDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Selma UgurelDepartment of Dermatology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Christoph KleinschnitzDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Martin GlasDivision of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Lisa ZimmerDepartment of Dermatology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Tim HagenackerDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Essen University Hospital · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCheckpoint inhibitors show impressive and durable responses in various cancer types and provide new avenues for cancer immunotherapy. However, these drugs have a variety of adverse events. Common autoimmune-related adverse effects include fatigue, hepatitis, skin rash, endocrine deficiencies, and colitis. Neurotoxicity has been reported, but its incidence and course remain unclear.

methodsTo illustrate the broad spectrum of neurotoxicity, we exemplarily report the neurological adverse events of five patients with melanoma and one patient with differentiated thyroid cancer who received checkpoint inhibitors at Essen University Hospital (Essen, Germany).

resultsAfter treatment with ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab, neurotoxic effects included hypophysitis-associated neck pain and headache, Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis, acute brachial plexus neuritis, and ocular myasthenia gravis.

conclusionsCheckpoint inhibitor therapy remains a success story; however, neurological immune-related adverse events may cause severe life-threatening conditions. We propose a guide for the early detection of neurological adverse events during routine clinical treatment to prevent more severe courses of checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity.

Indexed as

AIDP, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathyanti-CTLA-4, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4anti-PD-1, anti-programmed cell death protein 1Checkpoint inhibitorCIDP, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathyCNS, central nervous systemCSF, cerebrospinal fluidGuideICI, immune checkpoint inhibitorIpilimumabirAE, immune-related adverse eventsIVIG, intravenous immunoglobulini.v, intravenousMelanomaMG, Myasthenia GravisMRI, magnetic resonance imagingNeurotoxicityNivolumabPD-L1, programmed cell death protein 1 ligand

Identifiers

PMID33604462
PMCPMC7876540
OpenAlexW3112605369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.