Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604443›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2021

Vaginal epithelioid angiosarcoma: A literature review of a rare entity in an unusual site.

J Weishaupt, J Miller, M K Oehler

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J WeishauptDepartment of Gynaecology Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia.
J MillerDepartment of Gynaecology Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia.
M K OehlerDepartment of Gynaecology Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia.
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe an extremely rare case of a 66-year-old woman with a vaginal epithelioid angiosarcoma. She presented with constitutional symptoms, pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, and a violaceous vaginal lesion. A thorough gynaecological examination, tissue biopsy and imaging were crucial to establish an accurate diagnosis. With only 3 other cases reported in the literature, epithelioid angiosarcoma of the vagina seem to present late due to their nonspecific presentation and secluded location. Once diagnosed, optimal treatment is difficult to determine and together with the overly aggressive behaviour of these tumours, they are associated with a poor prognosis. To our knowledge, our case study and systematic literature review is the first to compare the management outcomes of epithelioid subtype angiosarcomas of the vagina. The rarity of this pathology contributes to diagnostic difficulties and lack of consensus regarding treatment of angiosarcomas of the vagina.

Indexed as

AngiosarcomaEpithelioid typeVaginal cancer

Identifiers

PMID33604443
PMCPMC7873630
OpenAlexW3121138547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.