Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604396›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological methods2021

Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish.

Matthew K LeFauve, Cassie J Rowe, Mikayla Crowley-Perry, Jenna L Wiegand, Arthur G Shapiro, Victoria P Connaughton

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Early life tributyltin exposure has long term physiological effects on the zebrafish (Danio rerio) visual system.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Zebrafish models of human-duplicatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Prolonged Hyperglycemia Causes Visual and Cognitive Deficits inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Zebrafish Behavioral Assays in Toxicology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew K LeFauveDepartment of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, 800 22 St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Cassie J RoweDepartment of Biology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
Mikayla Crowley-PerryDepartment of Biology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
Jenna L WiegandDepartment of Biology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
Arthur G ShapiroCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
Victoria P ConnaughtonDepartment of Biology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
American University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a visual stimulus that can be used with both larval and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). This protocol is a modification of a standard visual behavior analysis, the optomotor response (OMR). The OMR is often used to determine the spatial response or to detect directional visuomotor deficiencies. An OMR can be generated using a high contrast grated pattern, typically vertical bars. The spatial sensitivity is measured by detection and response to a change in grating bar width and is reported in cycles per degree (CPD). This test has been used extensively with zebrafish larvae and adults to identify visual- and/or motor-based mutations. Historically, when tested in adults, the grated pattern was presented from a vertical perspective, using a rotating cylinder around a holding tank, allowing the grating to be seen solely from the sides and front of the organism. In contrast, OMRs in zebrafish larvae are elicited using a stimulus projected below the fish. This difference in methodology means that two different experimental set-ups are required: one for adults and one for larvae. Our visual stimulus modifies the stimulation format so that a single OMR stimulus, suitable for use with both adults and larvae, is being presented underneath the fish. Analysis of visuomotor responses using this method does not require costly behavioral tracking software and, using a single behavioral paradigm, allows the observer to rapidly determine visual spatial response in both zebrafish larvae and adults.

Indexed as

behavioral neuroscienceoptomotor responsespatial frequencyvisuomotorzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID33604396
PMCPMC7884848
OpenAlexW3126389944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.