Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604335›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2020

Next-Generation Cancer Biomarkers: Extracellular Vesicle DNA as a Circulating Surrogate of Tumor DNA.

Samuel Amintas, Véronique Vendrely, Charles Dupin, Louis Buscail, Christophe Laurent, Barbara Bournet, Jean-Philippe Merlio, Aurélie Bedel, François Moreau-Gaudry, Julian Boutin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel AmintasDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Véronique VendrelyDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Charles DupinDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Louis BuscailCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Christophe LaurentDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Barbara BournetCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Philippe MerlioDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Aurélie BedelDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
François Moreau-GaudryDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Julian BoutinDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Sandrine DabernatDépartement des Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Etienne BuscailCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are produced by healthy tissues and tumor cells and are released in various bodily fluids, including blood. They are limited by bilayer phospholipidic membranes, and they carry a rich content in biomolecules. Their release cleanses the cells of their waste or serves as functional local and distant cell-cell communication and molecular exchange particles. This rich and heterogeneous content has been given intense attention in cancer physiopathology because EVs support cancer control and progression. Because of their specific active cargo, they are being evaluated as carriers of liquid biopsy biomarkers. Compared to soluble circulating biomarkers, their complexity might provide rich information on tumor and metastases status. Thanks to the acquired genomic changes commonly observed in oncogenic processes, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in EVs might be the latest most promising biomarker of tumor presence and complexity. This review will focus on the recent knowledge on the DNA inclusion in vesicles, the technical aspects of EV-DNA detection and quantification, and the use of EV-DNA as a clinical biomarker.

Indexed as

cancercirculating biomarkerEV-DNAexosomesextracellular vesiclesliquid biopsymicrovesicles

Identifiers

PMID33604335
PMCPMC7884755
OpenAlexW3128107707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.