ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2021
A pediatric case of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis due to rice bran.
Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent update on the management of anaphylaxis.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) caused by fruits and vegetables is increasing in recent years, but rice-induced FDEIA is rarely reported. The mechanism of FDEIA is unclear, although percutaneous sensitization occurs in some cases. A 14-year-old adolescent came our hospital who had 6 episodes of unknown FDEIA occurring from age 13. He affected atopic dermatitis in infancy, and he had been polishing rice daily to help with housework, and also had occasionally begun to observe urticaria while bathing after eating rice from 5 years old. Antigen-specific immunoglobulin E antibody titers (ImmunoCAP) were 1.35 UAmL for rice, 23.6 UAmL for orchard grass. Oral food challenge and exercise provocation test with polished rice were negative. An oral food challenge with rice bran was also negative, but exercise provocation test induced severe anaphylaxis. IgE immunoblotting with rice bran detected patient-specific bands, as 25-, 35-, 50-, and 60 kDa, and the 25- and 60-kDa bands were heat-resistant. In a suppression test using rice bran, these bands disappeared or diminished. In an inhibition test against orchard grass pollen with rice bran, inhibition was not observed. Conversely, an inhibition test against rice bran with orchard grass pollen, inhibition was observed in a concentration-dependent manner. This is extremely rare case of FDEIA in children, caused by rice bran. Furthermore, it might be induced by percutaneous sensitization. In FDEIA, it is necessary to scrutinize the possibility that rice bran may be the cause even in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.