Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604222›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Pain Perception During the Phases of Manual Reduction of Distal End Radius Fracture With a Periosteal Block.

Wan Assanul Afzan Wan Ali, Elaine Zi Fan Soh, Shalimar Abdullah, Parminder Singh Gill Narin Singh, Amir Adham Ahmad, Jamari Sapuan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Periosteal block versus intravenous regional anesthesia for reduction of distal radius fractures: A randomized controlled trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wan Assanul Afzan Wan AliDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Elaine Zi Fan SohDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Shalimar AbdullahDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Parminder Singh Gill Narin SinghDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Amir Adham AhmadDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Jamari SapuanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
National University of Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Closed reduction is an effective method of treatment for distal end radius fractures. We present a case series of patients with distal end radius fractures who underwent closed manipulative reduction using the periosteal block. We describe the technique in detail and examine its efficacy in pain lowering effect during closed reduction. Methods Nineteen patients with distal end radial and ulnar fractures were included and grouped based on the Frykman classification. The reduction was performed using a periosteal block of 10 ml of 2% lignocaine injection. The severity of pain was recorded by utilizing the visual analog scale (VAS) in five phases: 1) before injection, 2) after 15 minutes of analgesia in a resting position, 3) during minimal motion, 4) during full manipulation and reduction, and 5) post-procedure. The VAS scoring was classified as painless (VAS score of 0), mild pain (VAS score between 1-3), and painful (VAS score of 4 and above). Results The study included 19 patients [median age of 53 years (range: 18-88 years)]; there were 11 (58%) males and eight (42%) females. The mechanism of injury was a fall (n=12, 63%) or a motor vehicle accident (n=7, 37%). There was a statistically significant reduction of pain between phase one and all the other phases. Between the different fracture configurations, there was no significant difference in pain reduction. The most painful phase was expected to be phase four, ie, during full manipulation, in which four (21%) patients had a VAS score of 0, 12 (63%) patients had a VAS score between 1-3, and three (16%) patients had a VAS score of 4. Thus, 16 out of 19 patients (84%) had no or minimal pain during the most painful phase. There were no complications from the periosteal blocks. Conclusions The periosteal nerve block is an effective procedure providing satisfactory analgesia during the reduction of distal radial and ulnar fractures. It has no side effects and is free from complications associated with conventional sedation.

Indexed as

distal end radius fracturepain perceptionperiosteal blockreduction

Identifiers

PMID33604222
PMCPMC7881278
OpenAlexW3118929099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.