ArticleInternational journal of surgical oncology2021
Laparoscopic versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colon Cancer.
Article in International journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05713903 (Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Colectomy for Right Colon Cancer, According to the Complete Mesocolic Excision), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Colectomy for Right Colon Cancer, According to the Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) Principles: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Africa: an outcome comparison endorsed by the Nigerian society for colorectal disorders.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Complete mesocolic excision for right hemicolectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Open Right Hemicolectomy Outcomes: A Single-Centre Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Cancer-Related Malnutrition and Oxidative Stress in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology and Postoperative Outcomes.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparison of chyle leakage between laparoscopic and open colectomy in patients with colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Review
- Open versus laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy in patients with previous open partial cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Gastrocolic Trunk Resection for Advanced Transverse Colon Cancer.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Efficacy and Feasibility of Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation in Complicated Colorectal Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
resultsThe mean operative time was significantly longer in the LCME group than that in the OCME group with less mean intraoperative blood loss. Conversion was required in 4 patients (8.3%) in the LCME group. The use of laparoscopy increased the number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the open approach (39.81 ± 16.74 vs. 32.65 ± 12.28, respectively,
conclusionsIn conclusion, laparoscopic CME right hemicolectomy is a technically feasible and safe procedure if surgeon expertise is present. LCME has long-term oncologic outcomes (recurrence and survival) comparable to open surgery for management of patients with stage II or III colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.