ReviewIranian journal of microbiology2020
The efficacy of remdesivir in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review.
Review in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Potential limitations in systematic review studies assessing the effect of the main intervention for treatment/therapy of COVID-19 patients: An overview.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management of COVID-19: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline (updated version).Military Medical Research · 2020Guideline
- Navigating Therapeutic Frontiers: A Meta-review and Meta-analysis of COVID-19 Treatment Options.Journal of research in pharmacy practice · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes and considerations in outpatient with COVID-19 receiving remdesivir therapy.Health science reports · 2024Article
- COVID-19, Possible Hepatic Pathways and Alcohol Abuse-What Do We Know up to 2023?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- COVID-19 and liver injury: Pathophysiology, risk factors, outcome and management in special populations.World journal of hepatology · 2023Review
- Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Potential role of biochemical markers in the prognosis of COVID-19 patients.SAGE open medicine · 2022Review
- COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome versus classical acute respiratory distress syndrome (a narrative review).Iranian journal of microbiology · 2021Review
- Trends in the development of remdesivir based inventions against COVID-19 and other disorders: A patent review.Journal of infection and public health · 2021Review
- Analysis of COVID-19 Guideline Quality and Change of Recommendations: A Systematic Review.Health data science · 2021Review
- Drug-Induced Liver Disturbance During the Treatment of COVID-19.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- A Mini Review on Discovery and Synthesis of Remdesivir as an Effective and Promising Drug against COVID-19.Russian journal of bioorganic chemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesResearchers all around the world are working hard to find an effective treatment for the new coronavirus 2019. We performed a comprehensive systematic review to investigate the latest clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of treatment with Remdesivir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a systematic search in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Google scholar and MedRxiv for relevant observational and interventional studies. The outcomes measures were mortality rates, improvement rates, time to clinical improvement, all adverse event rates and severe adverse event rates.
resultsThree randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies were included in our study. In the 2 cohort studies, patients received Remdesivir for 10 days. 2 RCTs evaluated 10-day efficacy of treatment with Remdesivir versus placebo group and the other RCT compared its 5-day regimen versus 10-day regimen. Visual inspection of the forest plots revealed that the efficacy of Remdesivir was not much different in reducing 28-day mortality versus 14-day mortality rates. Besides, 10-day treatment regimen overpowered 5-day treatment and placebo in decreasing time to clinical improvement. All adverse event rates did not have a significant difference; however, severe adverse event rate was lower in the 5-day Remdesivir group compared to the 10-day and placebo groups.
conclusion5-day course of Remdesivir therapy in COVID-19 patients is probably efficacious and safe, and patients without invasive mechanical ventilation benefit the most. Treatment can be extended to 10 days if satisfactory improvement is not seen by day 5. Most benefits from Remdesivir therapy take place in the first 14 days of the start of the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.