Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33603923›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2021

Coordination of Axial Trunk Rotations During Gait in Low Back Pain. A Narrative Review.

Jaap H van Dieën, Maarten R Prins, Sjoerd M Bruijn, Wen Hua Wu, Bowei Liang, Claudine J C Lamoth, Onno G Meijer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaap H van DieënDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten R PrinsDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd M BruijnDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wen Hua WuOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, PR China.
Bowei LiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhengzhou, Fujian, P.R. China.
Claudine J C LamothUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen The Netherlands.
Onno G MeijerDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fujian Medical University · CNVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCentral Military Hospital · NLZhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain patients have been observed to show a reduced shift of thorax-pelvis relative phase towards out-of-phase movement with increasing speed compared to healthy controls. Here, we review the literature on this phase shift in patients with low back pain and we analyze the results presented in literature in view of the theoretical motivations to assess this phenomenon. Initially, based on the dynamical systems approach to movement coordination, the shift in thorax-pelvis relative phase with speed was studied as a self-organizing transition. However, the phase shift is gradual, which does not match a self-organizing transition. Subsequent emphasis in the literature therefore shifted to a motivation based on biomechanics. The change in relative phase with low back pain was specifically linked to expected changes in trunk stiffness due to 'guarded behavior'. We found that thorax-pelvis relative phase is affected by several interacting factors, including active drive of thorax rotation through trunk muscle activity, stride frequency and the magnitude of pelvis rotations. Large pelvis rotations and high stride frequency observed in low back pain patients may contribute to the difference between patients and controls. This makes thorax-pelvis relative phase a poor proxy of trunk stiffness. In conclusion, thorax-pelvis relative phase cannot be considered as a collective variable reflecting the orderly behaviour of a complex underlying system, nor is it a marker of specific changes in trunk biomechanics. The fact that it is affected by multiple factors may explain the considerable between-subject variance of this measure in low back pain patients and healthy controls alike.

Indexed as

coordinationgaitlow back painrelative phasetrunk

Identifiers

PMID33603923
PMCPMC7877281
OpenAlexW3130202995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.