ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Accelerated vs. conventional collagen cross-linking for infectious keratitis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of risk factors for treatment failure in canine patients undergoing photoactivated chromophore for keratitis - corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL): a retrospective study using additive bayesian network analysis.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- Photoactivated Chromophore Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Infectious Keratitis (PACK-CXL)-A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Factors Involved in Therapeutic Indications and Contraindications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Surgical Treatment in Silicone Oil-Associated Glaucoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Adherence to Therapy in Glaucoma Treatment-A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Non-antibiotic management of bacterial keratitis.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious keratitis represents a serious concern for ophthalmologists, with a progressively growing incidence in the last few years. In this prospective comparative study, we evaluated two groups of patients with infectious keratitis or corneal ulcer resistant to antimicrobial and antifungal therapy, treated respectively with conventional and accelerated photoactivated chromophore collagen cross-linking. Eight patients were assigned to each group and they were monitored for 12 months. We investigated the differences between groups, comparing on one side the mean of the quantitative variables using the t-test and on the other side the frequencies of qualitative variables using the Fisher exact test. The time to healing for the group treated with conventional cross-linking was 2 days longer than for the group undergoing accelerated cross-linking (34.9±11.4 vs. 32.9±9.4 days), a difference that did not reach statistical significance (P=0.708). We conclude that the accelerated protocol is as safe and efficient as the classic procedure. The accelerated protocol has an important advantage, both for the doctor and the patient, of being time sparing (the time for accelerated cross-linking is 3 times shorter than in the case of the conventional protocol).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.