Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33603767›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2020

Improvements in Gene Editing Technology Boost Its Applications in Livestock.

Iuri Viotti Perisse, Zhiqiang Fan, Galina N Singina, Kenneth L White, Irina A Polejaeva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. SCNT and genome editing in Buffalo, the black gold of the tropics.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeted Gene Knock-Out ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Animals in Respiratory Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iuri Viotti PerisseDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Zhiqiang FanDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Galina N SinginaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Podolsk, Russia.
Kenneth L WhiteDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Irina A PolejaevaDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accelerated development of novel CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing techniques provides a feasible approach to introduce a variety of precise modifications in the mammalian genome, including introduction of multiple edits simultaneously, efficient insertion of long DNA sequences into specific targeted loci as well as performing nucleotide transitions and transversions. Thus, the CRISPR/Cas9 tool has become the method of choice for introducing genome alterations in livestock species. The list of new CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing tools is constantly expanding. Here, we discuss the methods developed to improve efficiency and specificity of gene editing tools as well as approaches that can be employed for gene regulation, base editing, and epigenetic modifications. Additionally, advantages and disadvantages of two primary methods used for the production of gene-edited farm animals: somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT or cloning) and zygote manipulations will be discussed. Furthermore, we will review agricultural and biomedical applications of gene editing technology.

Indexed as

agricultureanimal modelsCRISPR/Cas9gene editinglivestock

Identifiers

PMID33603767
PMCPMC7885404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.