Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33603574›Full record

ReviewThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2021

Review of Fluconazole Treatment and Prophylaxis for Invasive Candidiasis in Neonates.

Chi D Hornik, Deborah S Bondi, Nicole M Greene, M Petrea Cober, Barnabas John

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Severe Congenital Candidiasis due toCase reports in pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chi D Hornik
Deborah S Bondi
Nicole M Greene
M Petrea Cober
Barnabas John

Funding

NIAAA NIH HHS HHSN275201000003CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000003I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive candidiasis accounts for approximately 10% of nosocomial infections in preterm infants, with an incidence of 1% to 4% among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions and a mortality as high as 20% to 30%. These outcomes warrant improved treatment and prevention strategies for infants at highest risk. The Infectious Diseases Society of America provides guidelines on antifungal medications for the prophylaxis and treatment of candidiasis in NICUs; however, there are still variations in practice on the use of fluconazole for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive candidiasis. This review provides specific information regarding fluconazole activity, pharmacokinetics, and a literature evaluation of dosing strategies and comparisons to other treatments in the neonatal population.

Indexed as

amphotericin Bantifungal agentsCandidacandidiasisfluconazolenewbornpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID33603574
PMCPMC7887891
OpenAlexW3130203618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.