Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33603434›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental gastroenterology2021

Birhanu Geta Meharie, Tewodros Agedew Tunta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Journal of evidence-based integrative medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Birhanu Geta MeharieDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-0627-0813
Tewodros Agedew TuntaDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-7690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe liver is a hub of metabolism and detoxification of substances. Since many redox reactions take place in the liver, it is prone to oxidative damage. Unlike conventional agents, botanicals act through several mechanisms in preventing oxidative damage. Among these

objectiveTo evaluate antioxidant and hepatoprotective activities of the 80% methanol extract of

methodsMale mice were divided into six groups and treated accordingly. Negative control was given 2% Tween 80, toxicant control administered with carbon tetrachloride (CCl

resultsThe levels of ALP, ALT, AST, GGT, LDH, and bilirubin were significantly reduced, while albumin and total protein were significantly increased after treatment with

conclusionThe results suggest that the 80% methanol extract of

Indexed as

CCl4DPPHhepatoprotectivemicePhytolacca dodecandraTBARS

Identifiers

PMID33603434
PMCPMC7886389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.