Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33603130›Full record

ReviewCancer gene therapy2022

Key chemokines direct migration of immune cells in solid tumors.

Karan Kohli, Venu G Pillarisetty, Teresa S Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer gene therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 362 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
362citing papers in PubMed
31.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

362 citing papers in PubMed, 542 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Green nanomedicine for cancer therapy.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

302 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karan KohliUniversity of Washington, Department of Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA. kohlik@uw.edu.
Venu G PillarisettyUniversity of Washington, Department of Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1162-9643
Teresa S KimUniversity of Washington, Department of Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune cell infiltration into solid tumors, their movement within the tumor microenvironment (TME), and interaction with other immune cells are controlled by their directed migration towards gradients of chemokines. Dysregulated chemokine signaling in TME favors the growth of tumors, exclusion of effector immune cells, and abundance of immunosuppressive cells. Key chemokines directing the migration of immune cells into tumor tissue have been identified. In this review, we discuss well-studied chemokine receptors that regulate migration of effector and immunosuppressive immune cells in the context of cancer immunology. We discuss preclinical models that have described the role of respective chemokine receptors in immune cell migration into TME and review preclinical and clinical studies that target chemokine signaling as standalone or combination therapies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentCell MovementChemokinesHumansChemokines

Identifiers

PMID33603130
PMCPMC8761573
OpenAlexW3131151008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.