Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33603105›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021

Implementing point of care ultrasound in the neonatal intensive care unit: a safety study.

Eileen Cowan, Ryan D Meinen, Michael R Lasarev, Awni Al-Subu, Adam S Bauer

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eileen Cowan *Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. ecowan@pediatrics.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6677-416X
Ryan D Meinen *Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-7678
Michael R LasarevDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1896-2705
Awni Al-SubuDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-5110
Adam S BauerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-876X
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePoint of care ultrasound (POCUS) use is increasing in pediatrics and has been demonstrated to be superior in identifying central catheter tip location in neonatal intensive care units. However, limited data exist regarding cardiorespiratory changes secondary to POCUS in neonates. STUDY

designA prospective observational equivalence study was performed on 50 POCUS assessments of central catheter tip location in 46 patients ≥23 weeks gestation. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and percent oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels were collected before and after POCUS. Limits of equivalence were set in advance.

resultEquivalence was demonstrated in HR, RR, and SpO2 before and after POCUS. HR decreased by 3.24 beats per minute (90% CI: -5.36, -1.14). RR increased by 0.71 breath/min (90% CI: -1.84, +3.27). SpO2 increased by 0.54 percentage points (90% CI: -0.23, +1.31).

conclusionIdentifying central catheter tip location using POCUS in neonates appears safe without affecting cardiorespiratory stability.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalPoint-of-Care SystemsChildHumansInfant, NewbornPoint-of-Care TestingProspective StudiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33603105
OpenAlexW3131121316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.