Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33602999›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Cerebrospinal fluid proteome shows disrupted neuronal development in multiple sclerosis.

Ellen F Mosleth, Christian Alexander Vedeler, Kristian Hovde Liland, Anette McLeod, Gerd Haga Bringeland, Liesbeth Kroondijk, Frode Steingrimsen Berven, Artem Lysenko, Christopher J Rawlings, Karim El-Hajj Eid and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Proteomics in Multiple Sclerosis: The Perspective of the Clinician.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ellen F MoslethNofima AS, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Osloveien 1, 1430, Ås, Norway. ellen.mosleth@nofima.no.
Christian Alexander VedelerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kristian Hovde LilandNofima AS, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Osloveien 1, 1430, Ås, Norway.
Anette McLeodNofima AS, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Osloveien 1, 1430, Ås, Norway.
Gerd Haga BringelandDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Liesbeth KroondijkNeuro-SysMed, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Frode Steingrimsen BervenProteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Artem LysenkoRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Christopher J RawlingsRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Karim El-Hajj EidNofima AS, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Osloveien 1, 1430, Ås, Norway.
Jill Anette OpsahlProteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bjørn Tore GjertsenCenter for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Science, Precision Oncology Research Group, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kjell-Morten MyhrDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sonia GavassoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. sonia.gavasso@helse-bergen.no.
Haukeland University Hospital · NONofima · NORothamsted Research · GBUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite intensive research, the aetiology of multiple sclerosis (MS) remains unknown. Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics has the potential to reveal mechanisms of MS pathogenesis, but analyses must account for disease heterogeneity. We previously reported explorative multivariate analysis by hierarchical clustering of proteomics data of MS patients and controls, which resulted in two groups of individuals. Grouping reflected increased levels of intrathecal inflammatory response proteins and decreased levels of proteins involved in neural development in one group relative to the other group. MS patients and controls were present in both groups. Here we reanalysed these data and we also reanalysed data from an independent cohort of patients diagnosed with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), who have symptoms of MS without evidence of dissemination in space and/or time. Some, but not all, CIS patients had intrathecal inflammation. The analyses reported here identified a common protein signature of MS/CIS that was not linked to elevated intrathecal inflammation. The signature included low levels of complement proteins, semaphorin-7A, reelin, neural cell adhesion molecules, inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H2, transforming growth factor beta 1, follistatin-related protein 1, malate dehydrogenase 1 cytoplasmic, plasma retinol-binding protein, biotinidase, and transferrin, all known to play roles in neural development. Low levels of these proteins suggest that MS/CIS patients suffer from abnormally low oxidative capacity that results in disrupted neural development from an early stage of the disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCerebrospinal Fluid ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisProteomeYoung AdultBiomarkersCerebrospinal Fluid ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID33602999
PMCPMC7892850
OpenAlexW3132688803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.