Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33602953›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Extraction of ingredients from tea leaves using oxidative enzymatic reaction and optimization of extraction conditions.

Rasool Pelalak, Afrasyab Khan, Masoud Habibi Zare, Mohammad Hasan Sadeghi, Azam Marjani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rasool PelalakInstitute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam.
Afrasyab KhanDepartment of Hydraulics and Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems, Institute of Engineering and Technology, South Ural State University (SUSU), Lenin Prospect 76, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454080.
Masoud Habibi ZareDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, 84156-83111, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Hasan SadeghiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, 84156-83111, Isfahan, Iran.
Azam MarjaniDepartment for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. azam.marjani@tdtu.edu.vn.
Isfahan University of Technology · IRDuy Tan University · VNSouth Ural State University · RUTon Duc Thang University · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peroxidase (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) are used as biocatalyst in many processes such as oxidization reactions, wastewater treatment, phenol synthesis and so on. The purpose of current study is enzymes extraction from biomass (tea leaves) as well as evaluation of their activation. Different parameters including temperature, buffer concentration, buffer type, buffer/tea leaves ratio, addition of high molecular weight polymers and emulsifiers, and pH were optimized in order to obtain the highest enzymes activity. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) procedure is employed for statistical analysis of enzymes extraction. It is understood from the result that PPO and POD possess the highest activity at temperatures of 25 °C and 50 °C, pH 7 and 5, buffer molarity of 0.1, and 0.05, buffer/tea leaves ratio = 5 for both, contact time = 20 min and 10 min, and presence of 6% and 3% PVP, 5% and 0% Tween 80 for PPO and POD, respectively. Amounts of highest activity for PPO and POD biocatalysts were calculated 0.42 U/mL and 0.025493 U/mL, respectively. Moreover, the entire inactivation of PPO took place after 30 min at 40 °C and 60 °C and 20 min at 80 °C. However, POD lost 35% of its activity after 30 min at 40 °C and 60 °C. The amount of 6% POD activity was kept after 45 min at 80 °C. Generally, it was indicated that POD was more resistant to thermal treatment than PPO.

Identifiers

PMID33602953
PMCPMC7892889
OpenAlexW3129384380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.