Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33602777›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2021

Simple vacuum cup to identify the primary myofascial restriction: the root cause of pain elsewhere.

Lenny Thinagaran Vasanthan, Manigandan Chockalingam

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lenny Thinagaran VasanthanPhysiotherapy Unit, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India lennyv@cmcvellore.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-6304
Manigandan ChockalingamOccupational Therapy, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-6895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of the primary source of pain determines the success of musculoskeletal pain management. A detailed history and physical examination are the current gold standards for identifying musculoskeletal pain source in day-to-day clinical practice. This process, at times, may potentially result in inadequate/inappropriate identification of the pain source. In this case report, we present the usefulness of a simple and inexpensive vacuum cup. We found that this accurately identified the primary pain source, distant from and unrelated to the site of pain presentation in a 30-year-old man with back pain. Routine use of this simple technique in conjunction with the regular musculoskeletal examination may better identify primary restrictions in the body tissues. Based on our experience, we propose that this approach has the potential to offer better outcomes in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain in the future.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainMyofascial Pain SyndromesAdultBack PainHumansMalePain ManagementVacuumback painmusculoskeletal syndromesphysiotherapy (rehabilitation)

Identifiers

PMID33602777
PMCPMC7896563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.