Observational studyBMJ open2021
Effectiveness of a sepsis programme in a resource-limited setting: a retrospective analysis of data of a prospective observational study (Ubon-sepsis).
Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02217592 (Causes and Factors Associated With Outcomes in Community-acquired Sepsis and Severe Sepsis in Northeast), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Causes and Factors Associated With Outcomes in Community-acquired Sepsis and Severe Sepsis in Northeast (NE) Thailand
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Infection in a Resource-Limited Setting in Southeast Asia: A Prospective Observational Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Emergency clinicians' use of adult and paediatric sepsis pathways: An implementation redesign using the behaviour change wheel.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Evaluating Sepsis Management and Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study of Clinical and Treatment Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic Accuracy of Screening Tools for Clinical Deterioration in Adults With Suspected Sepsis in Northeastern Thailand: A Cohort Validation Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Plasma Metabolomics Reveals Distinct Biological and Diagnostic Signatures for Melioidosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Sepsis Management in Southeast Asia: A Review and Clinical Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Comparative clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with community acquired bacteremia caused by Escherichia coli, Burkholderia pseudomallei and Staphylococcus aureus: A prospective observational study (Ubon-sepsis).PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a Sepsis Fast Track (SFT) programme initiated at a regional referral hospital in Thailand in January 2015.
designA retrospective analysis using the data of a prospective observational study (Ubon-sepsis) from March 2013 to January 2017.
settingGeneral medical wards and medical intensive care units (ICUs) of a study hospital.
participantsPatients with community-acquired sepsis observed under the Ubon-sepsis cohort. Sepsis was defined as modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score ≥2. MAIN EXPOSURE: The SFT programme was a protocol to identify and initiate sepsis care on hospital admission, implemented at the study hospital in 2015. Patients in the SFT programme were admitted directly to the ICUs when available. The non-exposed group comprised of patients who received standard of care. MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were measured sepsis management interventions.
resultsOf 3806 sepsis patients, 903 (24%) were detected and enrolled in the SFT programme of the study hospital (SFT group) and 2903 received standard of care (non-exposed group). Patients in the SFT group had more organ dysfunction, were more likely to receive measured sepsis management and to be admitted directly to the ICU (19% vs 4%). Patients in the SFT group were more likely to survive (adjusted HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.88, p=0.001) adjusted for admission year, gender, age, comorbidities, modified SOFA Score and direct admission to the ICUs.
conclusionsThe SFT programme is associated with improved sepsis care and lower risk of death in sepsis patients in rural Thailand, where some critical care resources are limited. The survival benefit is observed even when all patients enrolled in the programme could not be admitted directly into the ICUs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02217592.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.