Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33602701›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Menstrual experience of adolescents in the USA: protocol for a scoping review.

Ronke Olowojesiku, Deborah J Shim, Bryanna Moppins, Daye Park, Jasmine O Patterson, Samantha A Schoenl, Julie K Gaines, Edwin V Sperr, Amy Baldwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ronke OlowojesikuAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA rolowoj@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0514-3671
Deborah J ShimAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Bryanna MoppinsAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Daye ParkAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Jasmine O PattersonAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Samantha A SchoenlAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Julie K GainesAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Edwin V SperrAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Amy BaldwinAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn recent years, there has been a growing desire to address issues related to menstruation, particularly for adolescent girls. In low-income and middle-income countries, prior literature review of the adolescent menstrual experience suggests the need for further research into the impact and efficacy of interventions with this population. There is evidence to suggest the need for initiatives and research in higher-income countries like the USA. To date, the body of research on adolescent menstrual experience in the USA remains uncharacterised. Therefore, we propose a scoping review of the literature on this subject to better inform on areas for future primary study. METHODS AND ANALYSES: Using the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and expounded on by Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethics training for this study is not required, as the research team will review publicly available studies. Stakeholders working in adolescent and menstrual health were consulted in designing this review. We will share key findings with stakeholders and in scholarly journals at the conclusion of the review.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareMenstruationAdolescentFemaleHumansPopulation GroupsPovertyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicUnited Statesgynaecologypaediatricsreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID33602701
PMCPMC7896570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.