Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33602695›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Impact of C-reactive protein flare-response on oncological outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

Shohei Fukuda, Kazutaka Saito, Yosuke Yasuda, Toshiki Kijima, Soichiro Yoshida, Minato Yokoyama, Junichiro Ishioka, Yoh Matsuoka, Yukio Kageyama, Yasuhisa Fujii

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shohei FukudaUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2741-8338
Kazutaka SaitoUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan kzsaito@dokkyomed.ac.jp.
Yosuke YasudaUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiki KijimaUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Soichiro YoshidaUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Minato YokoyamaUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichiro IshiokaUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoh MatsuokaUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukio KageyamaUrology, Saitama Cancer Center, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Yasuhisa FujiiUrology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dynamic change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, CRP kinetics, is a prognostic factor for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era. We investigated the impact of early CRP kinetics on the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with mRCC.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 42 mRCC patients who were treated with nivolumab as a second-line or later therapy between 2016 and 2019. All patients had received previous TKI therapy. Patients were divided into three groups based on their early CRP kinetics: CRP levels increased to more than double compared with baseline within 1 month after initiation of nivolumab (flare) and then decreased to a lower value than baseline within 3 months (CRP flare-responders); CRP levels decreased by ≥30% within 3 months without "flare" (CRP responders); and the remaining patients (non-CRP responders). The maximum tumor shrinkage, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The association of the early CRP kinetics and oncological outcomes was assessed.

resultsThe median follow-up period was 8 months. The median baseline CRP level was 23 mg/L. CRP flare-responders, CRP responders, and non-CRP responders included 11 (26%), 15 (36%), and 16 (38%) patients, respectively. Thirteen patients (31%) died of mRCC. The maximum changes in target lesions from baseline of CRP flare-responder, CRP-responder, and non-CRP responder groups were -38%, -13%, and 16%, on average, respectively (p<0.001). ORRs of these three groups were 73%, 27%, and 6%, respectively (p<0.001). The median PFS values of each group were not reached, 12 months, and 2.4 months (p=0.005), and the median OS values were not reached, not reached, and 12 months (p=0.048). In a multivariate analysis, early CRP kinetics was a significant independent factor for objective response, PFS, and OS (p<0.001, p=0.004, and p=0.006, respectively).

conclusionsCRP flare-response was associated with significant tumor shrinkage and improved survival outcomes in patients with mRCC who were treated with nivolumab. Early CRP kinetics could be useful for evaluating nivolumab treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNivolumabRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabbiomarkersimmunotherapykidney neoplasmstumor

Identifiers

PMID33602695
PMCPMC7896625
OpenAlexW3130129495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.