ArticleBMJ global health2021
Participatory and responsive governance in universal health coverage: an analysis of legislative provisions in Thailand.
Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Stakeholder Primary Health Care for Migrant Populations in Thailand's Border Regions: A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Opportunities.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Social Participation for Health and Health Care Workers' Self-Management: Lessons from Socialist Yugoslavia for Contemporary Health Systems-A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Observational
- Barriers to the Implementation of Iran's Clean Air Act: A Policy-Oriented Scoping Review.Environmental health insights · 2026Review
- Regulatory evolution and service delivery models of telepharmacy in Thailand: a review of pandemic responses and future policy directions.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Review
- Examining the roles, relationships and power dynamics shaping universal health system policy processes in high- and upper-middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Health insurance coverage in Mexico: progress, inequalities and remaining challenges towards UHC2030.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Using evidence from civil society in national and subnational health policy processes: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Citizen engagement in national health insurance in rural western Kenya.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- "For a man to go to hospital, then that would be his last option": A qualitative study exploring men's experiences, perceptions and healthcare needs in the implementation of Universal Health Coverage in Kenya.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Procedural fairness in benefit package design: inclusion of pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV in Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- New strides towards fair processes for financing universal health coverage.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- Procedural fairness in health financing for universal health coverage: why, what and how.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- Developing the improved Community Health Fund in Tanzania: was it a fair process?Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- "Atlanta Is Like Wakanda … but With Real Big, Big Issues": A Focus Group Study of Community Strengths and Health Issues in Diverse Groups in Atlanta, Georgia.Family & community healthArticle
- Review
- Telemedicine Utilization Patterns and Implications Amidst COVID-19 Outbreaks in Thailand Under Public Universal Coverage Scheme.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Participatory and responsive governance in universal health coverage (UHC) systems synergistically ensure the needs of citizens are protected and met. In Thailand, UHC constitutes of three public insurance schemes: Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme, Social Health Insurance and Universal Coverage Scheme. Each scheme is governed through individual laws. This study aimed to identify, analyse and compare the legislative provisions related to participatory and responsive governance within the three public health insurance schemes and draw lessons that can be useful for other low-income and middle-income countries in their legislative process for UHC. The legislative provisions in each policy document were analysed using a conceptual framework derived from key literature. The results found that overall the UHC legislative provisions promote citizen representation and involvement in UHC governance, implementation and management, support citizens' ability to voice concerns and improve UHC, protect citizens' access to information as well as ensure access to and provision of quality care. Participatory governance is legislated in 33 sections, of which 23 are in the Universal Coverage Scheme, 4 in the Social Health Insurance and none in the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Responsive governance is legislated in 24 sections, of which 18 are in the Universal Coverage Scheme, 2 in the Social Health Insurance and 4 in the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Therefore, while several legislative provisions on both participatory and responsive governance exist in the Thai UHC, not all schemes equally bolster citizen participation and government responsiveness. In addition, as legislations are merely enabling factors, adequate implementation capacity and commitment to the legislative provisions are equally important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.