Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33602141›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular and cell biology2021

Global transcriptome profile of the developmental principles of in vitro iPSC-to-motor neuron differentiation.

Emilia Solomon, Katie Davis-Anderson, Blake Hovde, Sofiya Micheva-Viteva, Jennifer Foster Harris, Scott Twary, Rashi Iyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular and cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Personalized Stem Cell-Based Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Optimization of Application-Driven Development ofTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilia Solomon *Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Katie Davis-Anderson *Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Blake HovdeLos Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Sofiya Micheva-VitevaLos Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA. sviteva@lanl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2693-4333
Jennifer Foster HarrisLos Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Scott TwaryLos Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Rashi IyerLos Alamos National Laboratory, Analytics, Intelligence, and Technology Division, Los Alamos, NM, USA. rashi@lanl.gov.
Los Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

Los Alamos National Laboratory 20190167DR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) have opened new avenues for regenerative medicine. Consequently, iPSC-derived motor neurons have emerged as potentially viable therapies for spinal cord injuries and neurodegenerative disorders including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. However, direct clinical application of iPSC bears in itself the risk of tumorigenesis and other unforeseeable genetic or epigenetic abnormalities.

resultsEmploying RNA-seq technology, we identified and characterized gene regulatory networks triggered by in vitro chemical reprogramming of iPSC into cells with the molecular features of motor neurons (MNs) whose function in vivo is to innervate effector organs. We present meta-transcriptome signatures of 5 cell types: iPSCs, neural stem cells, motor neuron progenitors, early motor neurons, and mature motor neurons. In strict response to the chemical stimuli, along the MN differentiation axis we observed temporal downregulation of tumor growth factor-β signaling pathway and consistent activation of sonic hedgehog, Wnt/β-catenin, and Notch signaling. Together with gene networks defining neuronal differentiation (neurogenin 2, microtubule-associated protein 2, Pax6, and neuropilin-1), we observed steady accumulation of motor neuron-specific regulatory genes, including Islet-1 and homeobox protein HB9. Interestingly, transcriptome profiling of the differentiation process showed that Ca

conclusionsDetailed transcriptome profile of each developmental step from iPSC to motor neuron driven by chemical induction provides the guidelines to novel therapeutic approaches in the re-construction efforts of muscle innervation.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCells, CulturedGene Expression RegulationHedgehog ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsMotor NeuronsTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeHedgehog ProteinsHomeodomain Proteinsinsulin gene enhancer binding protein Isl-1LIM-Homeodomain ProteinsMNX1 protein, humanTranscription FactorsIn vitro neuronal networksiPSCsMotor neuronsNeuronal developmentStem cell reprogrammingTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33602141
PMCPMC7893891
OpenAlexW3129403655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.