Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33602135›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Comparative genomics reveals broad genetic diversity, extensive recombination and nascent ecological adaptation in Micrococcus luteus.

Yisong Li, Zhong-Zhi Sun, Jin-Cheng Rong, Bin-Bin Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole-genome sequencing and annotation ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  4. Unveiling the genomic secrets ofFrontiers in genetics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterization of Actinobacteria strains in Lebanese soil with an emphasis on investigating their antibacterial activity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pathogenetic characterization of aFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yisong LiMicrobial Technology Institute and State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Zhong-Zhi SunMicrobial Technology Institute and State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Jin-Cheng RongMicrobial Technology Institute and State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Bin-Bin XieMicrobial Technology Institute and State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China. xbb@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-7189

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31770412Young Scholars Program of Shandong University 2016WLJH41Youth Interdisciplinary Science and Innovative Research Groups of Shandong University 2020QNQT006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrococcus luteus is a group of actinobacteria that is widely used in biotechnology and is being thought as an emerging nosocomial pathogen. With one of the smallest genomes of free-living actinobacteria, it is found in a wide range of environments, but intraspecies genetic diversity and adaptation strategies to various environments remain unclear. Here, comparative genomics, phylogenomics, and genome-wide association studies were used to investigate the genomic diversity, evolutionary history, and the potential ecological differentiation of the species.

resultsHigh-quality genomes of 66 M. luteus strains were downloaded from the NCBI GenBank database and core and pan-genome analysis revealed a considerable intraspecies heterogeneity. Phylogenomic analysis, gene content comparison, and average nucleotide identity calculation consistently indicated that the species has diverged into three well-differentiated clades. Population structure analysis further suggested the existence of an unknown ancestor or the fourth, yet unsampled, clade. Reconstruction of gene gain/loss events along the evolutionary history revealed both early events that contributed to the inter-clade divergence and recent events leading to the intra-clade diversity. We also found convincing evidence that recombination has played a key role in the evolutionary process of the species, with upto two-thirds of the core genes having been affected by recombination. Furthermore, distribution of mammal-associated strains (including pathogens) on the phylogenetic tree suggested that the last common ancestor had a free-living lifestyle, and a few recently diverged lineages have developed a mammal-associated lifestyle separately. Consistently, genome-wide association analysis revealed that mammal-associated strains from different lineages shared genes functionally relevant to the host-associated lifestyle, indicating a recent ecological adaption to the new host-associated habitats.

conclusionsThese results revealed high intraspecies genomic diversity of M. luteus and highlighted that gene gain/loss events and extensive recombination events played key roles in the genome evolution. Our study also indicated that, as a free-living species, some lineages have recently developed or are developing a mammal-associated lifestyle. This study provides insights into the mechanisms that drive the genome evolution and adaption to various environments of a bacterial species.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialMicrococcus luteusAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsPhylogenyRecombination, GeneticAdaptive evolutionEcological differentiationIntraspecies diversityMicrococcus luteusPan-genomePopulation genomicsRecombination

Identifiers

PMID33602135
PMCPMC7890812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.