Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33601918›Full record

ReviewASN neuro

Regulation of GFAP Expression.

Michael Brenner, Albee Messing

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ASN neuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cellular responses of human Muller glia exposed to test dust pollution.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael BrennerDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Albee MessingWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6049-0521
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

The impact of GFAP mutations upon filament networksP01NS042803 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 2002 to 2012
$11.1M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
Patient-derived iPS cells as model systems for AxDP01HD076892 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NEDERGAARD, MAIKEN · 2014 to 2018
$6.0M
ANALYSES AND APPLICATIONS OF GLIAL FIBRILLARY ACIDIC PROR01NS039055 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BRENNER, MICHAEL · 1999 to 2010
$2.6M
Astrocyte-synapse interactions in a rat model of Alexander diseaseR01NS110719 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HAGEMANN, TRACY · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
Mouse Models of Alexander DiseaseR01NS060120 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD076892NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS042803NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039055NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060120NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expression of the GFAP gene has attracted considerable attention because its onset is a marker for astrocyte development, its upregulation is a marker for reactive gliosis, and its predominance in astrocytes provides a tool for their genetic manipulation. The literature on GFAP regulation is voluminous, as almost any perturbation of development or homeostasis in the CNS will lead to changes in its expression. In this review, we limit our discussion to mechanisms proposed to regulate GFAP synthesis through a direct interaction with its gene or mRNA. Strengths and weaknesses of the supportive experimental findings are described, and suggestions made for additional studies. This review covers 15 transcription factors, DNA and histone methylation, and microRNAs. The complexity involved in regulating the expression of this intermediate filament protein suggests that GFAP function may vary among both astrocyte subtypes and other GFAP-expressing cells, as well as during development and in response to perturbations.

Indexed as

AstrocytesGliosisGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansNeurogenesisPromoter Regions, GeneticGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinastrocytegene expressiongene structureGFAPgliogenesisregulation of transcription and translation

Identifiers

PMID33601918
PMCPMC7897836
OpenAlexW3131464748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.