Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33601911›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2021

Drug class effects on respiratory mechanics in animal models: access and applications.

Maria A Oliveira, Alembert E Lino-Alvarado, Henrique T Moriya, Renato L Vitorasso

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acepromazine Reduces Airway Contraction in a Murine Model of Asthma.Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria A OliveiraDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Science, University of Sao Paulo (USP) Sao Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil.
Alembert E Lino-AlvaradoBiomedical Engineering Laboratory - University of Sao Paulo (USP) Sao Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil.
Henrique T MoriyaBiomedical Engineering Laboratory - University of Sao Paulo (USP) Sao Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil.
Renato L VitorassoBiomedical Engineering Laboratory - University of Sao Paulo (USP) Sao Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1029-9160
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of respiratory mechanics extends from basic research and animal modeling to clinical applications in humans. However, to employ the applications in human models, it is desirable and sometimes mandatory to study non-human animals first. To acquire further precise and controlled signals and parameters, the animals studied must be further distant from their spontaneous ventilation. The majority of respiratory mechanics studies use positive pressure ventilation to model the respiratory system. In this scenario, a few drug categories become relevant: anesthetics, muscle blockers, bronchoconstrictors, and bronchodilators. Hence, the main objective of this study is to briefly review and discuss each drug category, and the impact of a drug on the assessment of respiratory mechanics. Before and during the positive pressure ventilation, the experimental animal must be appropriately sedated and anesthetized. The sedation will lower the pain and distress of the studied animal and the plane of anesthesia will prevent the pain. With those drugs, a more controlled procedure is carried out; further, because many anesthetics depress the respiratory system activity, a minimum interference of the animal's respiration efforts are achieved. The latter phenomenon is related to muscle blockers, which aim to minimize respiratory artifacts that may interfere with forced oscillation techniques. Generally, the respiratory mechanics are studied under appropriate anesthesia and muscle blockage. The application of bronchoconstrictors is prevalent in respiratory mechanics studies. To verify the differences among studied groups, it is often necessary to challenge the respiratory system, for example, by pharmacologically inducing bronchoconstriction. However, the selected bronchoconstrictor, doses, and administration can affect the evaluation of respiratory mechanics. Although not prevalent, studies have applied bronchodilators to return (airway resistance) to the basal state after bronchoconstriction. The drug categories can influence the mathematical modeling of the respiratory system, systemic conditions, and respiratory mechanics outcomes.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnestheticsAnimalsBronchoconstrictor AgentsBronchodilator AgentsNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsRespiratory MechanicsAnestheticsBronchoconstrictor AgentsBronchodilator AgentsNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsengineeringlungpharmacologyphysiologyPulmonaryrespiratory mechanics

Identifiers

PMID33601911
PMCPMC8113734
OpenAlexW3130571656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.