Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33600496›Full record

ReviewPloS one2021

Review of machine learning methods in soft robotics.

Daekyum Kim, Sang-Hun Kim, Taekyoung Kim, Brian Byunghyun Kang, Minhyuk Lee, Wookeun Park, Subyeong Ku, DongWook Kim, Junghan Kwon, Hochang Lee and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multi-modal sensing in colonoscopy: a data-driven approach.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Nature-Inspired Innovation in Electrical Engineering Technologies and Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advancing materials science through next-generation machine learning.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daekyum KimSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Hun KimSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0971-9292
Taekyoung KimSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3739-7403
Brian Byunghyun KangSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Minhyuk LeeSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Wookeun ParkSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9769-7101
Subyeong KuSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
DongWook KimSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8809-4114
Junghan KwonSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Hochang LeeSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Joonbum BaeSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Yong-Lae ParkSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Kyu-Jin ChoSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Sungho JoSoft Robotics Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-362X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft robots have been extensively researched due to their flexible, deformable, and adaptive characteristics. However, compared to rigid robots, soft robots have issues in modeling, calibration, and control in that the innate characteristics of the soft materials can cause complex behaviors due to non-linearity and hysteresis. To overcome these limitations, recent studies have applied various approaches based on machine learning. This paper presents existing machine learning techniques in the soft robotic fields and categorizes the implementation of machine learning approaches in different soft robotic applications, which include soft sensors, soft actuators, and applications such as soft wearable robots. An analysis of the trends of different machine learning approaches with respect to different types of soft robot applications is presented; in addition to the current limitations in the research field, followed by a summary of the existing machine learning methods for soft robots.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignHumansRoboticsSupervised Machine LearningWearable Electronic Devices

Identifiers

PMID33600496
PMCPMC7891779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.