Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33600441›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

The influence of negative mood on solitary drinking preference: An experiment with young adult solitary drinkers.

Carillon J Skrzynski, Kasey G Creswell, Timothy Verstynen, Rachel L Bachrach, Tammy Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carillon J SkrzynskiDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-5059
Kasey G CreswellDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Timothy VerstynenDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Rachel L BachrachCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Tammy ChungDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute for Health, Healthcare Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Carnegie Mellon University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

Predicting Alcohol Use and Alcohol Use Disorder Symptoms from Subjective Responses to Alcohol in a Laboratory Social SettingR01AA025936 · NIAAA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI CRESWELL, KASEY G. · 2017 to 2022
$2.1M
Implementation Intervention to Improve Care for Unhealthy Alcohol UseIK2HX003087 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI BACHRACH, RACHEL LAUREN · 2020 to 2025
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX003087NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solitary drinking is a risk marker for alcohol use disorder; thus, it is important to identify why individuals drink alone and for whom this association is particularly relevant. Evidence suggests the desire to ameliorate negative affect (NA) motivates solitary drinking, with some individuals particularly likely to drink alone to cope, but all past studies are cross-sectional. The present study therefore aimed to determine whether 1) experimentally induced NA increased preferences to drink alcohol alone, and 2) whether the relationship between NA and choosing to drink alcohol alone was moderated by neuroticism, drinking to cope motives, and social anxiety. Current drinkers (ages 21-29) with a solitary drinking history (N=126) were randomly assigned to either NA, positive affect [PA], or no affect change (control) conditions via differing cognitive task feedback. After the mood manipulation, participants chose between drinking alcoholic or nonalcoholic beverages in one of two contexts: alone or socially. Evidence regarding effectiveness of the mood manipulation was mixed, and few chose non-alcoholic beverages in either context. Condition did not influence outcome choice. Across conditions, increases in NA and the importance placed on receiving one's context choice were associated with solitary (versus social) alcohol preference. Neuroticism and its interaction with NA change also influenced choice; individuals high in neuroticism chose more solitary (versus social) drinking contexts while the opposite was true for those low in neuroticism, and among the latter, the preference difference was more pronounced with relatively smaller NA increases. Findings are discussed based on the existing solitary drinking literature.

Indexed as

AffectAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalNeuroticismYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33600441
PMCPMC7891730
OpenAlexW3132247060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.