Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33600435›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Deep6mA: A deep learning framework for exploring similar patterns in DNA N6-methyladenine sites across different species.

Zutan Li, Hangjin Jiang, Lingpeng Kong, Yuanyuan Chen, Kun Lang, Xiaodan Fan, Liangyun Zhang, Cong Pian

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. SARS-CoV-2 virus classification based on stacked sparse autoencoder.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zutan LiDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Hangjin JiangCenter for Data Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3905-7325
Lingpeng KongDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9407-7193
Yuanyuan ChenDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7953-1845
Kun LangCollege of information science & Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaodan FanDepartment of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2744-9030
Liangyun ZhangDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2425-9650
Cong PianDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7401-2926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N6-methyladenine (6mA) is an important DNA modification form associated with a wide range of biological processes. Identifying accurately 6mA sites on a genomic scale is crucial for under-standing of 6mA's biological functions. However, the existing experimental techniques for detecting 6mA sites are cost-ineffective, which implies the great need of developing new computational methods for this problem. In this paper, we developed, without requiring any prior knowledge of 6mA and manually crafted sequence features, a deep learning framework named Deep6mA to identify DNA 6mA sites, and its performance is superior to other DNA 6mA prediction tools. Specifically, the 5-fold cross-validation on a benchmark dataset of rice gives the sensitivity and specificity of Deep6mA as 92.96% and 95.06%, respectively, and the overall prediction accuracy is 94%. Importantly, we find that the sequences with 6mA sites share similar patterns across different species. The model trained with rice data predicts well the 6mA sites of other three species: Arabidopsis thaliana, Fragaria vesca and Rosa chinensis with a prediction accuracy over 90%. In addition, we find that (1) 6mA tends to occur at GAGG motifs, which means the sequence near the 6mA site may be conservative; (2) 6mA is enriched in the TATA box of the promoter, which may be the main source of its regulating downstream gene expression.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDNA MethylationAdenineArabidopsisBase SequenceBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, Nucleic AcidDNADNA, PlantFragariaNeural Networks, ComputerOryzaRosaSpecies Specificity6-methyladenineAdenineDNADNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID33600435
PMCPMC7924747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.