Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33600424›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

The adoption of the One Health approach to improve surveillance of venomous animal injury, vector-borne and zoonotic diseases in Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil.

André de Souza Leandro, Renata Defante Lopes, Caroline Amaral Martins, Açucena Veleh Rivas, Isaac da Silva, Sandro Roberto Galvão, Rafael Maciel-de-Freitas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Horizons of the Future: Preparedness and Response.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Systematic Review of the Ovitrap Surveillance ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

André de Souza LeandroCentro de Controle de Zoonoses, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9983-9559
Renata Defante LopesCentro de Controle de Zoonoses, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2427-2743
Caroline Amaral MartinsCentro de Controle de Zoonoses, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0649-8084
Açucena Veleh RivasLaboratório de Saúde Única, Centro de Medicina Tropical da Tríplice Fronteira, Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5960-101X
Isaac da SilvaCentro de Controle de Zoonoses, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2080-0200
Sandro Roberto GalvãoCentro de Controle de Zoonoses, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Paraná, Brazil.
Rafael Maciel-de-FreitasLaboratório de Transmissores de Hematozoários, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2198-6492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health institutions with sectorized structure and low integration among field teams, old-fashioned practices such as paper-based storage system, and poorly qualified health agents have limited ability to conduct accurate surveillance and design effective timely interventions. Herein, we describe the steps taken by the Zoonosis Control Center of Foz do Iguaçu (CCZ-Foz) in the last 23 years to move from an archaic and sectorized structure to a modern and timely surveillance program embracing zoonotic diseases, venomous animal injuries, and vector-borne diseases epidemiology under the One Health approach. The full implementation of the One Health approach was based on 5 axes: (1) merging sectorized field teams; (2) adoption of digital solutions; (3) health agents empowerment and permanent capacitation; (4) social mobilization; and (5) active surveys. By doing so, notifications related to zoonotic diseases and venomous animals increased 10 and 21 times, respectively, with no impairment on arbovirus surveillance (major concern in the city). Open sources database (PostgreSQL) and software (QGis) are daily updated and create real-time maps to support timely decisions. The adoption of One Health approach increased preparedness for endemic diseases and reemerging and emerging threats such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringOne HealthAnimalsBites and StingsBrazilDatabases, FactualGeographic Information SystemsHumansOrganizationsVector Borne DiseasesZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID33600424
PMCPMC7891772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.