ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021
What Every Reader Should Know About Studies Using Electronic Health Record Data but May Be Afraid to Ask.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Pooled it
- Digital Health Data Quality Issues: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Classifying Sickle Cell Disease Subtypes from Clinical Reports: Algorithm Validation and ICD-10 Accuracy Assessment in Five French Hospitals.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- HealthFlow: automating electronic health record analysis via a strategically self-evolving multi-agent framework.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A distributed analysis approach for pharmacovigilance data from electronic medical records in German university hospitals: the POLAR_MI ETL Pipeline.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The Consistency of Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Case Definitions in Electronic Health Record Data.Chest · 2026Article
- When algorithms infer gender: revisiting computational phenotyping with electronic health records data.Biology of sex differences · 2025Review
- Multimorbidity measurement strategies for predicting hospital visits.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Data science for pediatric infectious disease: utilizing COVID-19 as a model.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025Review
- TriNetX Dataworks-USA: Overview of a Multi-Purpose, De-Identified, Federated Electronic Health Record Real-World Data and Analytics Network and Comparison to the US Census.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
- Predicting Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Individuals Below Screening Age Using Machine Learning and Real-World Data: Case Control Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Utilization of Computable Phenotypes in Electronic Health Record Research: A Review and Case Study in Atopic Dermatitis.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2025Review
- Transparency in the secondary use of health data: assessing the status quo of guidance and best practices.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Breaking ICD Codes: Identifying Ambiguous Respiratory Infection Codes via Regional Diagnosis Heterogeneity.Annals of family medicine · 2025Article
- With big data comes big responsibility: Strategies for utilizing aggregated, standardized, de-identified electronic health record data for research.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Clinical Phenotypes May be Able to Identify Populations With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver-Spectrum Disease.Gastro hep advances · 2025Article
- "Goldmine" or "big mess"? An interview study on the challenges of designing, operating, and ensuring the durability of Clinical Data Warehouses in France and Belgium.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- The role and limitations of electronic medical records versus patient interviews for determining symptoms of, underlying comorbidities of, and medication use by patients with COVID-19.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Implementation of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Model in Electronic Medical Record Systems: Evaluation Study Using Factor Analysis and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-Best-Worst Methods.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Comorbidity Profiles of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Across the Medical Phenome.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coincident with the tsunami of COVID-19-related publications, there has been a surge of studies using real-world data, including those obtained from the electronic health record (EHR). Unfortunately, several of these high-profile publications were retracted because of concerns regarding the soundness and quality of the studies and the EHR data they purported to analyze. These retractions highlight that although a small community of EHR informatics experts can readily identify strengths and flaws in EHR-derived studies, many medical editorial teams and otherwise sophisticated medical readers lack the framework to fully critically appraise these studies. In addition, conventional statistical analyses cannot overcome the need for an understanding of the opportunities and limitations of EHR-derived studies. We distill here from the broader informatics literature six key considerations that are crucial for appraising studies utilizing EHR data: data completeness, data collection and handling (eg, transformation), data type (ie, codified, textual), robustness of methods against EHR variability (within and across institutions, countries, and time), transparency of data and analytic code, and the multidisciplinary approach. These considerations will inform researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders as to the recommended best practices in reviewing manuscripts, grants, and other outputs from EHR-data derived studies, and thereby promote and foster rigor, quality, and reliability of this rapidly growing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.