Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33600243›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2021

State Preemption: An Emerging Threat to Local Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation.

Eric Crosbie, Jennifer L Pomeranz, Kathrine E Wright, Samantha Hoeper, Laura Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. State Preemption and Local Tobacco Control: Constraints and Opportunities for Innovation in the US.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Did child obesity decline after 2016 food regulations in Chile?Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric CrosbieEric Crosbie, Kathrine E. Wright, and Samantha Hoeper are with the School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno. Eric Crosbie is also with the Ozmen Institute for Global Studies, University of Nevada, Reno. Jennifer L. Pomeranz is with the School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York. Laura Schmidt is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, and the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco.
Jennifer L PomeranzEric Crosbie, Kathrine E. Wright, and Samantha Hoeper are with the School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno. Eric Crosbie is also with the Ozmen Institute for Global Studies, University of Nevada, Reno. Jennifer L. Pomeranz is with the School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York. Laura Schmidt is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, and the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco.
Kathrine E WrightEric Crosbie, Kathrine E. Wright, and Samantha Hoeper are with the School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno. Eric Crosbie is also with the Ozmen Institute for Global Studies, University of Nevada, Reno. Jennifer L. Pomeranz is with the School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York. Laura Schmidt is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, and the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco.
Samantha HoeperEric Crosbie, Kathrine E. Wright, and Samantha Hoeper are with the School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno. Eric Crosbie is also with the Ozmen Institute for Global Studies, University of Nevada, Reno. Jennifer L. Pomeranz is with the School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York. Laura Schmidt is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, and the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco.
Laura SchmidtEric Crosbie, Kathrine E. Wright, and Samantha Hoeper are with the School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno. Eric Crosbie is also with the Ozmen Institute for Global Studies, University of Nevada, Reno. Jennifer L. Pomeranz is with the School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York. Laura Schmidt is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, and the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to examine the strategies promoting and countering state preemption of local sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes in the United States. Using Crosbie and Schmidt's tobacco preemption framework, we analyzed key tactics used by the SSB industry to achieve state preemption of local taxes identified in news sources, industry Web sites, government reports, and public documents.Starting in 2017, 4 states rejected and 4 passed laws preempting local SSB taxes. The beverage industry attempted to secure state preemption through front groups and trade associations, lobbying key policymakers, inserting preemptive language into other legislation, and issuing legal threats and challenges. The public health community's response is in the early stages of engaging in media advocacy, educating policymakers, mobilizing national collaboration, and expanding legal networks.State preemption of local SSB taxes is in the early stages but will likely scale up as local tax proposals increase. The public health community has a substantial role in proactively working to prevent preemption concurrent with health policy activity and using additional strategies successfully used in tobacco control to stop preemption diffusion.

Indexed as

LobbyingPolicy MakingSugar-Sweetened BeveragesCommerceHumansPublic HealthTaxesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33600243
PMCPMC7958065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.