Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33600220›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2021

Is This Science? Students' Experiences of Failure Make a Research-Based Course Feel Authentic.

Emma C Goodwin, Vladimir Anokhin, MacKenzie J Gray, Daniel E Zajic, Jason E Podrabsky, Erin E Shortlidge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DataVersify: A Framework for Data Literacy Instruction Featuring Scientist Stories.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Can We Quantify If It's a CURE?Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma C GoodwinBiology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201.
Vladimir AnokhinBiology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201.
MacKenzie J GrayBiology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201.
Daniel E ZajicBiology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201.
Jason E PodrabskyBiology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201.
Erin E ShortlidgeBiology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201.

Funding

EXITO: Enhancing Cross-disciplinary Infrastructure and Training at OregonUL1GM118964 · NIGMS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLER, THOMAS E · 2015 to 2023
$18.0M
EXITO: Enhancing Cross-disciplinary Infrastructure and Training at OregonRL5GM118963 · NIGMS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLER, THOMAS E · 2015 to 2023
$11.9M
EXITO: Enhancing Cross-disciplinary Infrastructure and Training at OregonTL4GM118965 · NIGMS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLER, THOMAS E · 2015 to 2022
$10.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118963NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118965NIGMS NIH HHS UL1 GM118964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) and inquiry-based curricula both expose students to the scientific process. CUREs additionally engage students in novel and scientifically relevant research, with the intention of providing an "authentic" research experience. However, we have little understanding of which course design elements impact students' beliefs that they are experiencing "authentic" research. We designed a study to explore introductory biology students' perceptions of research authenticity in CURE and inquiry classes. Using the Laboratory Course Assessment Survey, we found that students in CURE sections perceived higher levels of authentic research elements than students in inquiry-based sections. To identify specific factors that impact perceptions of research authenticity, we administered weekly reflection questions to CURE students. Coding of reflection responses revealed that experiences of failure, iteration, using scientific practices, and the relevant discoveries in their projects enhanced students' perceived authenticity of their research experiences. Although failure and iteration can occur in both CUREs and inquiry-based curricula, our findings indicate these experiences-in conjunction with the Relevant Discovery element of a CURE-may be particularly powerful in enhancing student perceptions of research authenticity in a CURE.

Indexed as

CurriculumStudentsEmotionsHumansLaboratoriesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33600220
PMCPMC8108493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.