Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33600045›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2021

The effect of autologous repair and voluntary wheel running on force recovery in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss.

Tyrone A Washington, Richard A Perry, John T Kim, Wesley S Haynie, Nicholas P Greene, Jeffrey C Wolchok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of volumetric muscle loss.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tissue Engineered 3D Constructs for Volumetric Muscle Loss.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024
    Review
  7. Journal of innovative optical health sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyrone A WashingtonExercise Muscle Biology Laboratory, Exercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1919-5907
Richard A PerryDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, College of Health and Human Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
John T KimCachexia Research Laboratory, Exercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Wesley S HaynieExercise Muscle Biology Laboratory, Exercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5893-519X
Nicholas P GreeneCachexia Research Laboratory, Exercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3829-1021
Jeffrey C WolchokRegenerative Biomaterials Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.

Funding

Engineering a Muscle Mimetic BiomaterialR15AR064481 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI WOLCHOK, JEFFREY · 2014 to 2014
$437k
Efficacy testing of an injectable matrix gel for the treatment of fatty muscle infiltrationR15AR073492 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI WOLCHOK, JEFFREY · 2018 to 2018
$428k
NIAMS NIH HHS R15 AR064481NIAMS NIH HHS R15 AR073492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NEW

findingsWhat is the central question of this study? Following large traumatic loss of muscle tissue (volumetric muscle loss; VML), permanent functional and cosmetic deficits present themselves and regenerative therapies alone have not been able to generate a robust regenerative response: how does the addition of rehabilitative therapies affects the regenerative response? What is the main finding and its importance? Using exercise along with autologous muscle repair, we demonstrated accelerated muscle force recovery response post-VML. The accentuated force recovery 2 weeks post-VML would allow patients to return home sooner than allowed with current therapies. ABSTRACT: Skeletal muscle can regenerate from damage but is overwhelmed with extreme tissue loss, known as volumetric muscle loss (VML). Patients suffering from VML do not fully recover force output in the affected limb. Recent studies show that replacement tissue (i.e., autograph) into the VML defect site plus physical activity show promise for optimizing force recovery post-VML. The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of autologous repair and voluntary wheel running on force recovery post-VML. Thirty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats had 20% of their left tibialis anterior (LTA) excised then replaced and sutured into the intact muscle (autologous repair). The right tibialis anterior (RTA) acted as the contralateral control. Sixteen rats were given free access to a running wheel (Wheel) whereas the other 16 remained in a cage with the running wheel locked (Sed). At 2 and 8 weeks post-VML, the LTA underwent force testing; then the muscle was removed and morphological and gene expression analysis was conducted. At 2 weeks post-injury, normalized LTA force was 58% greater in the Wheel group compared to the Sed group. At 8 weeks post-VML, LTA force was similar between the Wheel and Sed groups but was still lower than the uninjured RTA. Gene expression analysis at 2 weeks post-VML showed the wheel groups had lower mRNA content of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor α compared to the Sed group. Overall, voluntary wheel running promoted early force recovery, but was not sufficient to fully restore force. The accentuated early force recovery is possibly due to a more pro-regenerative microenvironment.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityRegenerationAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyexerciseinflammationregenerative medicinerehabilitative medicineVML

Identifiers

PMID33600045
PMCPMC8628541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.