Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33599954›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2021

Auditory Phenotypic Variability in Friedreich's Ataxia Patients.

Nehzat Koohi, Gilbert Thomas-Black, Paola Giunti, Doris-Eva Bamiou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ataxia patient care pathway and associated healthcare costs in Italy: a cross-sectional survey.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Auditory neuropathy in mice and humans with Friedreich ataxia.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Friedreich ataxia: clinical features and new developments.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2022
    Review
  7. Friedreich's Ataxia and Auditory Processing Disorder.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nehzat KoohiThe Ear Institute, University College London, London, WC1X 8EE, UK. n.koohi@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-8527
Gilbert Thomas-BlackDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Paola GiuntiDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK. p.giunti@ucl.ac.uk.
Doris-Eva BamiouThe Ear Institute, University College London, London, WC1X 8EE, UK. d.bamiou@ucl.ac.uk.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory neural impairment is a key clinical feature of Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA). We aimed to characterize the phenotypical spectrum of the auditory impairment in FRDA in order to facilitate early identification and timely management of auditory impairment in FRDA patients and to explore the relationship between the severity of auditory impairment with genetic variables (the expansion size of GAA trinucleotide repeats, GAA1 and GAA2), when controlled for variables such as disease duration, severity of the disease and cognitive status. Twenty-seven patients with genetically confirmed FRDA underwent baseline audiological assessment (pure-tone audiometry, otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response). Twenty of these patients had additional psychophysical auditory processing evaluation including an auditory temporal processing test (gaps in noise test) and a binaural speech perception test that assesses spatial processing (Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test). Auditory spatial and auditory temporal processing ability were significantly associated with the repeat length of GAA1. Patients with GAA1 greater than 500 repeats had more severe auditory temporal and spatial processing deficits, leading to poorer speech perception. Furthermore, the spatial processing ability was strongly correlated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate an association between genotype and auditory spatial processing phenotype in patients with FRDA. Auditory temporal processing, neural sound conduction, spatial processing and speech perception were more severely affected in patients with GAA1 greater than 500 repeats. The results of our study may indicate that auditory deprivation plays a role in the development of mild cognitive impairment in FRDA patients.

Indexed as

Friedreich AtaxiaBiological Variation, PopulationGenotypeHumansPhenotypeTrinucleotide RepeatsAuditory processing,Cognition,Friedreich’s ataxia,GAA1Hearing,Phenotype,

Identifiers

PMID33599954
PMCPMC8360871
OpenAlexW3132849669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.