Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33599923›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Giovanni Coticchio, Barry Behr, Alison Campbell, Marcos Meseguer, Dean E Morbeck, Valerio Pisaturo, Carlos E Plancha, Denny Sakkas, Yanwen Xu, Thomas D'Hooghe and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giovanni Coticchio9.baby Family and Fertility Center, Via Dante, 15, 40125, Bologna, Italy. giovanni.coticchio@nove.baby.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9205
Barry BehrDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alison CampbellCARE Fertility Group, John Webster House, Nottingham, UK.
Marcos MeseguerIVI-RMA Global, Valencia, Spain.
Dean E MorbeckFertility Associates, Auckland, New Zealand.
Valerio PisaturoReproductive Medicine Department, International Evangelical Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Carlos E PlanchaInst. Histologia e Biologia do Desenvolvimento, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa and CEMEARE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Denny SakkasBoston IVF, Waltham, MA, USA.
Yanwen XuReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Thomas D'HoogheDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Evelyn CottellGlobal Medical Affairs Fertility, R&D Biopharma, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Kersti LundinReproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Merck KGaA N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore how the assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratories can be optimized and standardized to enhance embryo culture and selection, to bridge the gap between standard practice and the new concept of shortening time to healthy singleton birth.

methodsA Delphi consensus was conducted (January to July 2018) to assess how the ART laboratory could be optimized, in conjunction with existing guidelines, to reduce the time to a healthy singleton birth. Eight experts plus the coordinator discussed and refined statements proposed by the coordinator. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 29 participants (including the eight experts from step 1), who voted on their agreement/disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if ≥ 66% of participants agreed/disagreed with a statement. If consensus was not achieved for any statement, that statement was revised and the process repeated until consensus was achieved. Details of statements achieving consensus were communicated to the participants.

resultsConsensus was achieved for all 13 statements, which underlined the need for professional guidelines and standardization of lab processes to increase laboratory competency and quality. The most important points identified were the improvement of embryo culture and embryo assessment to shorten time to live birth through the availability of more high-quality embryos, priority selection of the most viable embryos and improved cryosurvival.

conclusionThe efficiency of the ART laboratory can be improved through professional guidelines on standardized practices and optimized embryo culture environment, assessment, selection and cryopreservation methodologies, thereby reducing the time to a healthy singleton delivery.

Indexed as

CryopreservationFemaleFertilityFertility ClinicsHumansPregnancyReproductive Techniques, AssistedSurveys and QuestionnairesART laboratoryConsensusExpert opinionProcess optimizationTime to live birth

Identifiers

PMID33599923
PMCPMC8190195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.