ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021
Totally endoscopic sublay (TES) repair for lateral abdominal wall hernias: technique and first results.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic lateral abdominal hernia repair and outcomes a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative analysis of efficacy and quality of life between totally extraperitoneal sublay and intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for ventral hernia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lateral incisional hernia. EVEREG registry analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Reverse TAR may be added when necessary in open preperitoneal repair of lateral incisional hernias: a retrospective multicentric cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- The sensitivity of ultrasound in the clinical diagnosis of inguinal hernias in adults: a comparative study.Journal of ultrasound · 2022Article
- Comparative review of outcomes: single-incision laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal sub-lay (SIL-TES) mesh repair versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for ventral hernia.Updates in surgery · 2022Review
- [Management of lateral abdominal wall hernias].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Review
- Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty and laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair for Nyhus type II hernia in women.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal surgical treatment for lateral hernias of the abdominal wall remains unclear. The presented prospective study assesses for the first time in detail the clinical value of a totally endoscopic sublay (TES) technique for the repair of these hernias.
methodsTwenty-four consecutive patients with a lateral abdominal wall hernia underwent TES repair. This technique is naturally combined with a transversus abdominis release maneuver to create a sufficient retromuscular/preperitoneal space that can accommodate, if necessary, a giant prosthetic mesh.
resultsThe operations were successful in all but one patient who required open conversion because of dense intestinal adhesion. The mean defect width was 6.7 ± 3.9 cm. The mean defect area was 78.0 ± 102.4 cm
conclusionsA totally endoscopic technique (TES) for the treatment of lateral hernias is described. The technique revealed to be reliable, safe and cost-effective. The first results are promising, but larger studies with longer follow-up periods are recommended to determine the real clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33599899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.