Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33599775›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association of 13 Occupational Carcinogens in Patients With Cancer, Individually and Collectively, 1990-2017.

Na Li, Zhen Zhai, Yi Zheng, Shuai Lin, Yujiao Deng, Grace Xiang, Jia Yao, Dong Xiang, Shuqian Wang, Pengtao Yang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A One Health Perspective on Cancer: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Update on Occupational Cancer for Better Cancer Prevention and Control.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Review
  13. Leukemia Incidence by Occupation and Industry: A Cohort Study of 2.3 Million Workers from Ontario, Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Na LiDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zhen ZhaiDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yi ZhengDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Shuai LinDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yujiao DengDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Grace XiangCollege of Arts and Sciences, New York University, New York.
Jia YaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Dong XiangCelilo Cancer Center, Oregon Health Science Center Affiliated Mid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles.
Shuqian WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Pengtao YangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Si YangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Peng XuDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Ying WuDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Jingjing HuDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Zhijun DaiDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Meng WangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNZhejiang University · CNDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFlorida State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Occupational exposure to carcinogens has been shown to pose a serious disease burden at the global, regional, and national levels. Based on epidemiologic studies and clinical observations, working environment appears to have important effects on the occurrence of human malignant tumors; however, to date, no systematic articles have been published that specifically investigated cancer burden due to occupational exposure in an individual and collective manner. Objective: To estimate the degree of exposure and evaluate the cancer burden attributable to occupational carcinogens (OCs) individually and collectively by sex, age, year, and location. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study including data on 195 countries from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from June 24, 2020, to July 20, 2020. Exposures: Thirteen OCs (ie, arsenic, asbestos, benzene, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, diesel engine exhaust, formaldehyde, nickel, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, silica, sulfuric acid, and trichloroethylene). Main Outcomes and Measures: The degree and change patterns of exposure as well as the attributable cancer burden, including deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), by sex, age, year, and location for 13 OCs. The calculation of the population-attributable fraction was based on past exposure in the population and relative risks. Results: Based on the GBD 2017 study, 13 OCs attributable to 7 cancer types were included. Most summary exposure values for the 13 OCs, particularly those of diesel engine exhaust (35.6% increase; 95% uncertainty interval [UI], 32.4%-38.5%) and trichloroethylene (30.3% increase; 95% UI, 27.3%-33.5%), increased from 1990 to 2017. Only exposure to asbestos decreased by 13.8% (95% UI, -26.7% to 2.2%). In 2017, 319 000 (95% UI, 256 000-382 000) cancer deaths and 6.42 million (95% UI, 5.15 million to 7.76 million) DALYs were associated with OCs combined, accounting for 61.0% (95% UI, 59.6%-62.4%) of the total cancer deaths and 48.3% (46.3% to 50.2%) of the DALYs. Among the 13 OCs, the 3 leading risk factors for cancer burden were asbestos (71.8%), silica (15.4%), and diesel engine exhaust (5.6%). For most OCs, the attributed cancer outcome was tracheal, bronchial, and lung cancer, which accounted for 89.0% of attributable cancer deaths. China (61 644 cancer deaths), the US (42 848), and Japan (20 748) accounted for the largest number of attributable cancer deaths in 2017; for DALYs, China (1.47 million), the US (0.71 million), and India (0.37 million) were the 3 leading countries. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that although OC exposure levels have decreased, the overall cancer burden is continuously increasing.

Indexed as

CarcinogensGlobal Burden of DiseaseQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAdolescentAdultAgedArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBerylliumCadmiumChinaChromiumCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFormaldehydeArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBerylliumCadmiumCarcinogensChromiumFormaldehydeNickelPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSilicon Dioxidesulfuric acidSulfuric AcidsTrichloroethyleneVehicle Emissions

Identifiers

PMID33599775
PMCPMC7893501
OpenAlexW3132224107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.