ReviewAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2021
Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?
Review in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetically responsive electrospun fibers as programmable bioactive scaffolds: From formulation design to magnetically triggered therapy and regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Bridging the Lab-to-Clinic Gap in Intranasal Nanomaterial-Based Chemotherapy for Glioblastoma.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Pharmaceutical Compounding as a Pillar of Personalized Oncology: Current Applications, Emerging Technologies, and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Engineering combination nanomedicines to overcome cancer resistance.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-enabled delivery of plant-derived bioactive metabolites for diabetic retinopathy: from evidence appraisal to preclinical translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Theranostic Potentials of Metallic Nanoparticles in Thyroid Diseases: Challenges and Prospects.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Delivery strategies to improve the pharmacological efficacy of NRF2 modulators: a review.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Review
- Exploring the Potentials of Hyaluronic Acid-coated Polymeric Nanoparticles in Enhanced Cancer Treatment by Precision Drug Delivery, Tackling Drug Resistance, and Reshaping the Tumour Micro Environment.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Regulatory pathways and guidelines for nanotechnology-enabled health products: a comparative review of EU and US frameworks.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- A translational framework to DELIVER nanomedicines to the clinic.Nature nanotechnology · 2024Review
- Advancements in Nanoparticle Characterization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Practical Guidance for Diagnosing and Treating Iron Deficiency in Patients with Heart Failure: Why, Who and How?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to Human Therapeutic Nanoparticle Development.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Need for Expansion of Pharmacy Education Globally for the Growing Field of Nanomedicine.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- How Do Hospital Pharmacists Approach Substitution of Nanomedicines? Insights from a Qualitative Pilot Study and a Quantitative Market Research Analysis in Five European Countries.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis review provides an overview of the proceedings of the symposium "Tackling the Challenges of Nanomedicines: Are We Ready?" organized by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) Hospital Pharmacy Section and Non-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs) Working Group at the 2019 FIP World Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Debate centered on reasons underlying the current complex regulatory landscape for nanomedicines and their follow-on products (referred to as nanosimilars) and the pivotal role of hospital pharmacists in selecting, handling, and guiding usage of nanomedicines and nanosimilars. SUMMARY: The evaluation and use of nanomedicines are recognized among scientific, pharmaceutical, and regulatory bodies as complex. Interchangeability and substitutability of nanomedicines and nanosimilars are confounded by a lack of pharmaceutical and pharmacological equivalence, reflecting the inherent complex nature of these drug products and manufacturing processes. Consequences include implications for clinical safety and efficacy and, ultimately, comparability. Local regulatory approvals of some nanomedicines have occurred, but there is no standard to ensure streamlined evaluation and use of consistent measures of therapeutic equivalence of reference products and their nanosimilars. Hospital pharmacists are expected to be experts in the selection, handling, and substitution of nanomedicines and familiarize themselves with the limitations of current methods of assessing pharmaceutical and clinical equivalence of nanosimilars in order to ensure informed formulary decision-making and eventual patient benefit.
conclusionSupportive guidance for pharmacists focusing on the substitutability and/or interchangeability of nanomedicines and their nanosimilars is needed. Current FIP guidance for pharmacists on therapeutic interchange and substitution should be extended to include nanomedicines and nanosimilars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.