Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33599450›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2021

Presentation and survival among patients with colorectal cancer before the age of screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Christopher D Griffiths, Tyler McKechnie, Yung Lee, Jeremy E Springer, Aristithes G Doumouras, Dennis Hong, Cagla Eskicioglu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Colorectal Cancer in Younger Adults.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher D GriffithsFrom the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Griffiths, McKechnie, Lee, Springer, Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu); the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (McKechnie, Lee); and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ont. (Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu).
Tyler McKechnieFrom the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Griffiths, McKechnie, Lee, Springer, Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu); the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (McKechnie, Lee); and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ont. (Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu).
Yung LeeFrom the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Griffiths, McKechnie, Lee, Springer, Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu); the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (McKechnie, Lee); and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ont. (Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu).
Jeremy E SpringerFrom the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Griffiths, McKechnie, Lee, Springer, Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu); the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (McKechnie, Lee); and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ont. (Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu).
Aristithes G DoumourasFrom the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Griffiths, McKechnie, Lee, Springer, Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu); the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (McKechnie, Lee); and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ont. (Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu).
Dennis HongFrom the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Griffiths, McKechnie, Lee, Springer, Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu); the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (McKechnie, Lee); and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ont. (Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu).
Cagla EskiciogluFrom the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Griffiths, McKechnie, Lee, Springer, Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu); the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (McKechnie, Lee); and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ont. (Doumouras, Hong, Eskicioglu).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer in North America is rising among patients younger than 50 years. Available data are conflicting regarding presentation and outcomes in this population. This review aimed to synthesize literature regarding young patients with colorectal cancer with respect to patient demographics, disease extent and survival, compared with patients older than 50 years. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed for articles published between 1990 and the time of search. Articles comparing North American patients with colorectal cancer younger and older than 50 years were eligible for inclusion. We used a random-effects model to pool odds ratios. Results: Eight retrospective studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 790 959). Mean age was 42.6 years (standard deviation [SD] 5.07) in the younger group, and 69.1 years (SD 9.25) in the older group. Young patients were more likely to present with regional (odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.40) and distant disease (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.30-1.67). Considering patients at all stages of disease, differences in 5-year overall survival (OR 1.54, 95%CI 0.96-2.47) and cancer-specific survival (OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.91-1.13) were not statistically significant between groups. However, when controlling for disease extent, 5-year cancer-specific survival was significantly higher among young patients with local (OR 1.69, 95%CI 1.43-1.99), regional (OR 1.37, 95%CI 1.16-1.63) and distant disease (OR 1.79, 95%CI 1.45-2.21). Conclusion: North American patients presenting with colorectal cancer before the age of 50 years are more likely to have advanced disease. Although overall and cancer-specific survival is not significantly different between these groups, younger patients have improved survival when controlling for cancer stage.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdultAge FactorsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansMiddle AgedSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID33599450
PMCPMC7955831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.