Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33599389›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

"I would not go to him": Focus groups exploring community responses to a public health campaign aimed at reducing unnecessary diagnostic imaging of low back pain.

Sweekriti Sharma, Adrian C Traeger, Elise Tcharkhedian, Janet Harrison, Jolyn K Hersch, Kristen Pickles, Ian A Harris, Chris G Maher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. "I would not go to him": Focus groups exploring community responses to a public health campaign aimed at reducing unnecessary diagnostic imaging of low back pain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sweekriti SharmaFaculty of Medicine and Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0919-8813
Adrian C TraegerFaculty of Medicine and Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elise TcharkhedianPhysiotherapy Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Janet HarrisonClinical Governance Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jolyn K HerschWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kristen PicklesWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ian A HarrisFaculty of Medicine and Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chris G MaherFaculty of Medicine and Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity awareness of the harms of overdiagnosis remains low.

objectiveTo evaluate community responses to a public health campaign designed for health service waiting rooms that focuses on the harms of unnecessary diagnostic imaging for low back pain.

methodsWe conducted two focus groups of 19 community members with or without low back pain in Sydney, Australia. This study formed the fourth and final stage of the development process of a public health campaign: (a) initial design, (b) expert review and revision, (c) online experiment and (d) community views & revision. We evaluated reactions to components of the campaign that included digital posters and an information leaflet using strong imagery and messaging about the risk of overdiagnosis. We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis to identify main themes.

resultsCommunity members reacted with surprise, initial mistrust, and occasionally anger towards imagery and messaging that suggested diagnostic imaging tests could be unnecessary and harmful. With further reflection and discussion, and after reading longer format information about overdiagnosis, the participants found some of the messages informative and useful. Participants appeared to gain a better understanding of the concept of overdiagnosis and the importance of not rushing to imaging.

conclusionsPublic health campaigns including posters and leaflets displayed in waiting rooms could raise awareness about overuse of diagnostic imaging and the harms of overdiagnosis more broadly. However, negative reactions are possible and must be managed carefully. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: We involved a community participation manager who provided advice on the focus group discussion guide, participant recruitment and manuscript presentation.

Indexed as

Low Back PainDiagnostic ImagingFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansMaleMedical Overusediagnostic imaginggeneral publiclow back painoverdiagnosispublic health campaign

Identifiers

PMID33599389
PMCPMC8077077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.