Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33599336›Full record

Observational studyUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2021

Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of Doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome.

H Wolf, T Stampalija, C C Lees, TRUFFLE Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fetal Cerebral Blood Flow (Dys)autoregulation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Predictive value of fetal Doppler velocimetry, fetal growth trajectory and maternal serum biomarkers for short-term adverse perinatal outcome: secondary analysis of DRIGITAT study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H WolfDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-2149
T StampalijaUnit of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-3848
C C LeesDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-5561
TRUFFLE Study Group

Funding

Department of Health NIHR127976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFirst, to compare published Doppler reference charts of the ratios of flow in the fetal middle cerebral and umbilical arteries (i.e. the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR)). Second, to assess the association of thresholds of CPR and UCR based on these charts with short-term composite adverse perinatal outcome in a cohort of pregnancies considered to be at risk of late preterm fetal growth restriction.

methodsStudies presenting reference charts for CPR or UCR were searched for in PubMed. Formulae for plotting the median and the 10

resultsTen studies presenting reference charts for CPR or UCR were retrieved. There were large differences between the charts in the 10

conclusionsIn the gestational-age range of 32 to 36 weeks, adjustment of CPR or UCR for gestational age is not necessary when assessing the risk of adverse outcome in pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction. The adoption of absolute CPR or UCR thresholds, independent of reference charts, is feasible and makes clinical assessment simpler than if using percentiles or other gestational-age normalized units. The high variability in percentile threshold values among the commonly used UCR and CPR reference charts hinders reliable diagnosis and clinical management of late preterm fetal growth restriction. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationPlacental CirculationAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationFetusGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesReference ValuesRisk Assessmentadverse outcomebrain sparingcerebroplacental ratioDopplerfetal growth restrictionmiddle cerebral arterypercentilereference chartumbilicocerebral ratio

Identifiers

PMID33599336
PMCPMC8597586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.