ArticleAmerican journal of community psychology2021
Scales of Practices and Outcomes for Community-Engaged Research.
Article in American journal of community psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Definitions of community-level approaches to address substance-related harms and lessons learned: A systematic overview of reviews.American journal of community psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Pooled it
- Strategies for high-quality community-based participatory research partnerships in public health research.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Implementation Strategies Applied in Communities Matching Process (ISAC Match): Expanded Guidance and Case Study.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- How to (or how not to)…Enhance equity in the conduct of global health research: dimensions and directions for organizations.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Community-Engaged Research From a Diné-Centered Perspective: Advancing Mentorship and Transforming Praxis.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025Article
- Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025Article
- The Role of Community Science in Addressing Policy Change: A Critical Review of Air Pollution Literature.Current environmental health reports · 2025Review
- Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Development and pilot of a tool evaluating community-engaged group processes and community-centered impact for institutional level advisory boards.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- A short pragmatic tool for evaluating community engagement: Partnering for Health Improvement and Research Equity.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Developing the engage for equity institutional multi-sector survey: Assessing academic institutional culture and climate for community-based participatory research (CBPR).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Contextualizing barriers and facilitators to scaling community-engaged research transformation at a historically black medical school.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Research with and Inclusive of Children in Immigrant Families: A Narrative Review of Methods and Approaches.Academic pediatrics · 2024Review
- The Spanish translation, adaptation, and validation of a Community-Engaged Research survey and a pragmatic short version: Encuesta Comunitaria and FUERTES.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Participatory Action Project to Address Opioid Misuse: Breaking Down Barriers Through Partnership Processes.Gateways : international journal of community research & engagement · 2024Article
- A scoping review of the globally available tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research: a Delphi consensus study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Rationale and design of integrating a parents first obesity intervention with a pediatric weight management intervention for rural families - Evaluating the ripple effect.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the growth of research on community-engaged research (CEnR), recent reviews suggest there has been limited development of validated scales to measure key contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes, impairing testing and refinement of theoretical models. The purpose of this study is to present the psychometric properties of scales from the Engage for Equity (E2) project, stemming from a long-term research partnership examining community-engaged research projects. This study used a three-stage, cross-sectional format: (a) a sampling frame of 413 CEnR projects was identified; (b) 210 principal investigators completed a project-level survey and nominated partners for another survey; (c) 457 investigators and partners completed a survey about project contexts, processes, interventions, and outcomes. Factorial validity was established through confirmatory factor analysis supporting seven scales: contextual capacity, commitment to collective empowerment, relationships, community engagement in research actions, synergy, partner and partnership transformation, and projected outcomes. Convergent validity was established through examining covariances among the scales. This study largely yielded results consistent with a previous psychometric study of related measures, while demonstrating improved ceiling effects of the items and refined conceptualization of core theoretical constructs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.