Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33599089›Full record

ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2022

Treatment decision-making needs among emerging adults with early psychosis.

Elizabeth C Thomas, John Suarez, Alicia Lucksted, Laura Siminoff, Irene Hurford, Lisa Dixon, Maria O'Connell, Mark Salzer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth C ThomasCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6543-9856
John SuarezCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alicia LuckstedSchool of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Laura SiminoffCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Irene HurfordIrene Hurford MD PLLC, Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lisa DixonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Maria O'ConnellYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Mark SalzerCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Temple University · USColumbia University · USHaverford College · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USYale University · US

Funding

Supplement: Facilitating Emerging Adult Engagement in Evidence-Based Treatment for Early Psychosis through Peer-Delivered Decision.K08MH116101 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI THOMAS, ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$739k
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH116101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimMany emerging adults disengage from early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services prematurely. Service disengagement may be in part due to having unresolved treatment decision-making needs about use of mental health services. A basic understanding of the decision-making needs of this population is lacking. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the range of treatment decisions that emerging adults face during their initial engagement in an EIP program and elucidate barriers and facilitators to decision-making.

methodsTwenty emerging adults with early psychosis were administered semistructured interviews to capture treatment decision-making experiences during the first six months after enrolment in an EIP program. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Responses were independently coded by two authors using an integrated thematic analysis approach; differences in coding were discussed to consensus. Data analysis was facilitated using NVivo 12 Plus.

resultsEmerging adults identified numerous decisions faced after EIP enrolment. Decisions pertaining to life and treatment goals and to starting and continuing psychiatric medication were commonly selected as the most difficult/complicated. Decision-making barriers included not having the right amount or type of information/knowledge, social factors (e.g., lacking social support, opposition/pressure), lacking internal resources (e.g., cognitive and communication skills, self-efficacy, motivation) and unappealing options. Obtaining information/knowledge, social supports (e.g., connection/trust, learning from others' experiences, encouragement), considering personal values, and time were decision-making facilitators.

conclusionsThis study informs development and optimization of interventions to support decision-making among emerging adults with early psychosis, which may promote service engagement.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPsychotic DisordersAdultHumansMotivationQualitative Researchcoordinated specialty caredecision supportfirst-episode psychosisservice engagementshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID33599089
PMCPMC9116145
OpenAlexW3130514289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.