Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598870›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2021

Evaluation of multi-target deep neural network models for compound potency prediction under increasingly challenging test conditions.

Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez, Jürgen Bajorath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raquel Rodríguez-PérezDepartment of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Friedrich-Hirzebruch-Allee 6, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Jürgen BajorathDepartment of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Friedrich-Hirzebruch-Allee 6, 53115, Bonn, Germany. bajorath@bit.uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-5714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) enables modeling of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and compound potency predictions. Recently, multi-target QSAR models have been gaining increasing attention. Simultaneous compound potency predictions for multiple targets can be carried out using ensembles of independently derived target-based QSAR models or in a more integrated and advanced manner using multi-target deep neural networks (MT-DNNs). Herein, single-target and multi-target ML models were systematically compared on a large scale in compound potency value predictions for 270 human targets. By design, this large-magnitude evaluation has been a special feature of our study. To these ends, MT-DNN, single-target DNN (ST-DNN), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR) models were implemented. Different test systems were defined to benchmark these ML methods under conditions of varying complexity. Source compounds were divided into training and test sets in a compound- or analog series-based manner taking target information into account. Data partitioning approaches used for model training and evaluation were shown to influence the relative performance of ML methods, especially for the most challenging compound data sets. For example, the performance of MT-DNNs with per-target models yielded superior performance compared to single-target models. For a test compound or its analogs, the availability of potency measurements for multiple targets affected model performance, revealing the influence of ML synergies.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipRegression AnalysisDeep neural networksMachine learningModel validationMulti-target learningStructure–activity relationships

Identifiers

PMID33598870
PMCPMC7982389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.