Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598845›Full record

ReviewObesity surgery2021

Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review.

Mohammad Kermansaravi, Amir Hossein DavarpanahJazi, Shahab ShahabiShahmiri, Miguel Carbajo, Antonio Vitiello, Chetan D Parmar, Mario Musella

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad KermansaraviMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rasool-e Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Hossein DavarpanahJaziMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Shahab ShahabiShahmiriMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Miguel CarbajoCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Calle Estacion, No. 12, 1, 47004, Valladolid, Spain.
Antonio VitielloAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.
Chetan D ParmarWhittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK. drcparmar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1238-6524
Mario MusellaAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOne anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. MATERIAL AND

methodsAfter identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020.

resultsIn this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items.

conclusionThere is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidConsensus Statements as TopicHumansRetrospective StudiesWeight LossBariatric surgeryConsensusMini gastric bypassOne anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.