Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598732›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

A live porcine model for surgical training in tracheostomy, neck dissection, and total laryngectomy.

Ignacio Alcalá Rueda, José Miguel Villacampa Aubá, Alberto Encinas Vicente, María Benavides Gabernet, Carlos Carnero Guerrero, Carlos Castilla C Reparaz, Eduard Teixeira de Freitas, Alfonso Campos González, Carlos Cenjor Español

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Everything but the squeal: a guide for head and neck surgery training on the live porcine model.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ignacio Alcalá RuedaOtolaryngology Department, University Hospital Infanta Elena, Carretera de Alpedrete a Moralzarzal, M-608 Km 41, Collado Villalba, 28400, Madrid, Spain. alcalarueda@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-187X
José Miguel Villacampa AubáOtolaryngology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Encinas VicenteOtolaryngology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
María Benavides GabernetOtolaryngology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Carnero GuerreroAnimal Laboratory Facility, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Castilla C ReparazAnimal Laboratory Facility, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Eduard Teixeira de FreitasOtolaryngology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso Campos GonzálezOtolaryngology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Cenjor EspañolOtolaryngology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHead and neck surgery is associated with a steep learning curve, creating a need for effective training methods. Live animal models can be useful in acquiring the required skills and techniques to perform tracheostomy, neck dissection, and laryngectomy. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and usefulness of a porcine model to teach tracheostomy, neck dissection, and laryngectomy, describing the similarities between a swine head and neck surgical model and the human cervical area.

methodsTwelve surgical training sessions were held with the use of a live porcine model maintained under general anaesthesia; a total of 39 procedures were performed. In each session, one otolaryngology resident per year performed a procedure to acquire the targeted competencies for their respective year of training. Each procedure was time recorded and evaluated based on a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. Linear regression was used to analyse the data and express the results as percentages.

resultsTraining exercises were performed in shorter times over the study period. A 9% reduction in the time spent was observed. There was a global improvement in the evaluation made by OSATS score of 6% in the first period (2018-2019) and 58% in the second period (2019-2020).

conclusionThe porcine model was both manageable and helpful in providing training despite slight anatomical differences between human beings and pigs. However, more studies are necessary to guarantee that the competencies acquired with this type of training are transferable to real-life interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceTracheostomyAnimalsLaryngectomyLearning CurveNeck DissectionSwineHead and neckLaboratory animal modelResident educationTraining program

Identifiers

PMID33598732
OpenAlexW3129317890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.