Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598570›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2021

Should treatment of low-level rifampicin mono-resistant tuberculosis be different?

F A Gopie, E Commiesie, S Baldi, M Kamst, D Kaur, W C M de Lange, P S Pinas, D Stijnberg, M Wongsokarijo, C W R Zijlmans and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical standards for the dosing and management of TB drugs.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
  9. Should treatment of low-level rifampicin mono-resistant tuberculosis be different?Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

F A GopieAcademic Hospital Paramaribo, Paramaribo, Suriname.
E CommiesieNational Tuberculosis Program, Paramaribo, Suriname.
S BaldiCentral Laboratory, Paramaribo, Suriname.
M KamstNational Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
D KaurMassachusetts Supranational TB Reference Laboratory, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Jamaica Plane, MA, USA.
W C M de LangeDepartment Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands.
P S PinasCentral Laboratory, Paramaribo, Suriname.
D StijnbergNational Tuberculosis Program, Paramaribo, Suriname.
M WongsokarijoCentral Laboratory, Paramaribo, Suriname.
C W R ZijlmansFaculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname.
R de ZwaanNational Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
D van SoolingenNational Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
S G S VredenAcademic Hospital Paramaribo, Paramaribo, Suriname.
G de VriesCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLAnton de Kom University of Suriname · SRAcademic Hospital Paramaribo · SRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRifampicin resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) was frequently detected in Suriname after the introduction of Xpert MTB/RIF in 2012. Subsequent phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) was not conclusive at that moment, while RR-TB patients treated with first-line tuberculostatics had good treatment outcome. In our study, we analysed this interesting observation.

methodsWe collected demographic and clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of TB patients from May 2012-December 2018 and performed a univariate and multivariate analysis to assess possible associations with resistance to rifampicin. Secondly, we conducted whole genome sequencing on all available

findingsRR-TB was detected in 59 (9.6%) patients confirmed by Xpert. These patients were treated with rifampicin-containing regimens in most (88%) of the cases. In all 32 samples examined, a D435Y mutation in the

interpretationThis study confirms a low-level rifampicin mono-resistance in TB patients of Suriname. These patients could benefit from a first-line regimen with high dose rifampicin (or rifabutin), rather than from the lengthy treatment regimens for rifampicin-resistant and multi-drug resistant TB, a concept of stratified medicine also advocated for the treatment of TB.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Drug resistanceDrug-susceptibility testingTreatment OutcomeTuberculosisXpert MTB/RIF

Identifiers

PMID33598570
PMCPMC7869001
OpenAlexW3126806299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.