Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598530›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2021

Continuous gait monitoring discriminates community-dwelling mild Alzheimer's disease from cognitively normal controls.

Vijay R Varma, Rahul Ghosal, Inbar Hillel, Dmitri Volfson, Jordan Weiss, Jacek Urbanek, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Vadim Zipunnikov, Amber Watts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Differences in Daily Physical Activity by Alzheimer's Risk Markers Among Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vijay R VarmaClinical and Translational Neuroscience Section Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience National Institute on Aging (NIA) National Institutes of Health (NIH) Baltimore Maryland USA.
Rahul GhosalDepartment of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA.
Inbar HillelCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Israel.
Dmitri VolfsonNeuroscience Analytics Computational Biology, Takeda Cambridge Massachusetts USA.
Jordan WeissDepartment of Demography University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USA.
Jacek UrbanekDepartment of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.
Jeffrey M HausdorffCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Israel.
Vadim ZipunnikovDepartment of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA.
Amber WattsDepartment of Psychology University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA.

Funding

University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Core CentersP30AG035982 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BROOKS, WILLIAM M. · 2011 to 2020
$16.6M
Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$13.0M
GRADUATE TRAINING IN DEMOGRAPHYT32HD007242 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MICHEL GUILLOT · 1985 to 2026
$6.6M
HEARTLAND INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHUL1RR033179 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2011 to 2011
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000001NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033179NIA NIH HHS P30 AG035982NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFew studies have explored whether gait measured continuously within a community setting can identify individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study tests the feasibility of this method to identify individuals at the earliest stage of AD.

methodsMild AD (n = 38) and cognitively normal control (CNC; n = 48) participants from the University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Center Registry wore a GT3x+ accelerometer continuously for 7 days to assess gait. Penalized logistic regression with repeated five-fold cross-validation followed by adjusted logistic regression was used to identify gait metrics with the highest predictive performance in discriminating mild AD from CNC.

resultsVariability in step velocity and cadence had the highest predictive utility in identifying individuals with mild AD. Metrics were also associated with cognitive domains impacted in early AD. DISCUSSION: Continuous gait monitoring may be a scalable method to identify individuals at-risk for developing dementia within large, population-based studies.

Indexed as

accelerometerAlzheimer's diseasedigital biomarkergait

Identifiers

PMID33598530
PMCPMC7864220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.