Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598474›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2020

Traditional Food Environment and Factors Affecting Indigenous Food Consumption in Munda Tribal Community of Jharkhand, India.

Suparna Ghosh-Jerath, Ridhima Kapoor, Satabdi Barman, Geetanjali Singh, Archna Singh, Shauna Downs, Jessica Fanzo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Suparna Ghosh-JerathIndian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Ridhima KapoorIndian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Satabdi BarmanIndian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Geetanjali SinghDepartment of Botany, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee University Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Archna SinghDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Shauna DownsDepartment of Urban-Global Public Health, Rutgers School of Public Health, Newark, NJ, United States.
Jessica FanzoBerman Institute of Bioethics, Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, United States.
Public Health Foundation of India · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INJohns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/16/1/502639Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous food (IF) systems, derived from natural ecosystems are perceived to be sustainable and nutritionally adequate. Mundas, an indigenous tribal community in Jharkhand India, are surrounded by rich agroforestry resources, yet display high levels of malnutrition. Our study explored the food environment of Munda community, different IFs they accessed, levels of utilization of IFs in routine diets, their nutritional attributes and factors influencing IF consumption. A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted in nine villages of Murhu and Torpa blocks in Khunti district, Jharkhand. Using focus group discussions and key informant interviews, we did free-listing of IFs known to the community. This was followed by enumerating preferred and little used/historically consumed IFs, along with reasons. Qualitative enquiries were recorded and transcribed verbatim; data were coded and analyzed using thematic framework approach. The listed IFs were identified through common names and photographs, and verified by ethnobotanist in the team. The nutritive values of identified IFs were searched in literature or nutritional analysis of specific plant based foods were undertaken in an accredited laboratory. The community demonstrated traditional ecological knowledge of several IFs (

Indexed as

factors affecting indigenous food consumptionindigenous foodsmicronutrientsMunda tribesnutritive valuetraditional food environmentunderutilized indigenous foods

Identifiers

PMID33598474
PMCPMC7882711
OpenAlexW3127118591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.